Re-ordered scoping for admins, added comments

Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
This commit is contained in:
snipe 2024-04-11 14:39:37 +01:00
parent 570944a48b
commit a19b86add0

View file

@ -35,16 +35,40 @@ abstract class SnipePermissionsPolicy
public function before(User $user, $ability, $item)
{
// Lets move all company related checks here.
if ($item instanceof \App\Models\SnipeModel && ! Company::isCurrentUserHasAccess($item)) {
return false;
}
// If an admin, they can do all asset related tasks.
/**
* If an admin, they can do all asset related tasks, but constrained by FMCSA company access.
* That scoping happens on the model level (except for the Users model) via the Companyable trait.
*
* This does lead to some inconsistencies in the responses, since attempting to edit assets,
* accessories, etc (anything other than users) will result in a Forbidden error, whereas the users
* area will redirect with "That user doesn't exist" since the scoping is handled directly on those queries.
*
* The *superuser* global permission gets handled in the AuthServiceProvider before() method.
*
* @see https://snipe-it.readme.io/docs/permissions
*/
if ($user->hasAccess('admin')) {
return true;
}
/**
* The Company::isCurrentUserHasAccess() method from the company model handles the check for FMCS already so we
* don't have to do that here.
*/
if (!Company::isCurrentUserHasAccess($item)) {
return false;
}
}
/**
* These methods handle the generic view/create/edit/delete permissions for the model.
*
* @param User $user
* @return bool
*/
public function index(User $user)
{
return $user->hasAccess($this->columnName().'.view');