From 19e5749e546d3c700c3353e2a9b0b47e3822be43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: withoutgettingwet <15240053+withoutgettingwet@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:04:51 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Update docs/about/faq.mdx

Co-authored-by: pdxlocations <117498748+pdxlocations@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 docs/about/faq.mdx | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/about/faq.mdx b/docs/about/faq.mdx
index 3593a30d..5e26986a 100644
--- a/docs/about/faq.mdx
+++ b/docs/about/faq.mdx
@@ -172,9 +172,7 @@ If you use your ham radio license with Meshtastic, consider both the privileges
     {
       title: "Why aren’t licensed and unlicensed modes interoperable? Is this a planned feature?",
       content: `
-- Amateur radio regulations vary widely around the world; many countries have specific and often differing regulations against the use of encryption over amateur radio. 
-- Additionally, many countries have regulations preventing licensed operators from relaying third party messages (in this case, the messages of unlicensed stations) or the relaying of licensed stations’ messages without an accompanying call sign. 
-- This makes interoperability impossible at worst and unfeasible at best; as a result interoperability between these modes is not a planned feature.`,
+Amateur radio regulations differ significantly across countries, with many prohibiting the use of encryption. Additionally, regulations in some countries restrict licensed operators from relaying messages from unlicensed stations or transmitting messages from licensed stations without including a call sign. These restrictions make interoperability highly impractical, if not impossible. Consequently, interoperability between these modes is not a planned feature.`,
     },
   ],
   "mesh": [