mudhorn/meshtastic
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/meshtastic/meshtastic.git synced 2024-12-24 21:24:44 -08:00
Code Issues Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Suggest against SX1276 devices (#1613)
Some checks are pending
CI / quality (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / build (push) Waiting to run
Details

Browse source 
* fix(hardware-devices): clarify that at this point, SX1276 devices are not recommended. This is a minor tweak in wording to emphasize that SX1276 isn't OK, it's bad, by new standards in performance.

* Update docs/hardware/devices/index.mdx

Co-authored-by: pdxlocations <117498748+pdxlocations@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: pdxlocations <117498748+pdxlocations@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ryan Turner 2024-12-02 21:05:19 -06:00 committed by GitHub
parent eaf8f8ae33
commit 54a3859dd7
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/hardware/devices/index.mdx
View file

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Please do your research and choose the board that meets your needs (or maybe alr
:::info
- The Semtech SX1262 transceiver is newer than the SX1276 and provides increased receive and transmit performance.
- Devices using the previous-generation Semtech SX1276 are no longer recommended due to their inferior performance.
- nRF52-based devices use a fraction of the power compared to ESP32-based devices and are therefore generally preferred for solar and handset applications.
- ESP32-based devices require more power to operate but are typically lower-cost alternatives that do perform well when using house power, or for handsets that only require a day or two of runtime, and for applications that require WiFi connectivity.