mirror of
https://github.com/meshtastic/meshtastic.git
synced 2024-11-09 23:24:10 -08:00
Update lora.mdx
I've noticed a tendency of users to set to very-long-slow because they think the only disadvantage is speed. As per conversations with Garth, very-long-slow is unreliable, rarely ACKs and does not form meshes well. This is mentioned nowhere in the docs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c1e328e9bf
commit
8bb2e3d01d
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The Presets available are as follows, and follow a linear pattern of Fastest \<\
|
|||
|
||||
7. `LONG_SLOW`
|
||||
|
||||
8. `VERY_LONG_SLOW` (Slowest, lowest bandwidth, highest airtime, longest range)
|
||||
8. `VERY_LONG_SLOW` (Slowest, lowest bandwidth, highest airtime, longest range. Not recommended for regular usage as does not form meshes well and is unreliable)
|
||||
|
||||
### Max Hops
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue