From c62981ecf2fba99f6579d0296e066f1460a0305a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Meadors Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:27:21 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] It's ours --- blog/2024/August/why-meshtastic-uses-managed-flood-router.mdx | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/2024/August/why-meshtastic-uses-managed-flood-router.mdx b/blog/2024/August/why-meshtastic-uses-managed-flood-router.mdx index f164b844..341470b5 100644 --- a/blog/2024/August/why-meshtastic-uses-managed-flood-router.mdx +++ b/blog/2024/August/why-meshtastic-uses-managed-flood-router.mdx @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Designing a low-bandwidth wireless mesh network to run on low-power microprocess Since Flood Routing is not very efficient, we realize that this approach is not perfect. The firmware has a number of measures in place to limit traffic in order not to overwhelm a mesh, but as with any RF based protocol, there are limitations to the capacity of the mesh. In attempts to enhance the efficiency, we have evaluated “smarter” routing protocols at times in the past. However, we have yet to find anything that would consistently outperform the current approach in the use-cases and scenarios Meshtastic is currently being utilized. We’ll go over several reasons for why we believe Managed Flood Routing remains a superior approach for Meshtastic. -## Key Advantages of Managed Flood Routing +## Key Advantages of Meshtastic's Managed Flood Routing 1. Eliminates route discovery overhead 2. Provides superior adaptation to dynamic network topologies