## Summary
Deduplicate, separate, organize and speed up tests for subworkflow
caller policy checks.
Follow-up to: https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/pull/7913
```
PASS test/unit/PermissionChecker.test.ts
check()
✓ should allow if workflow has no creds (3 ms)
✓ should allow if requesting user is instance owner (83 ms)
✓ should allow if workflow creds are valid subset (151 ms)
✓ should deny if workflow creds are not valid subset (85 ms)
checkSubworkflowExecutePolicy()
no caller policy
✓ should fall back to N8N_WORKFLOW_CALLER_POLICY_DEFAULT_OPTION (1 ms)
overridden caller policy
✓ if no sharing, policy becomes workflows-from-same-owner (1 ms)
workflows-from-list caller policy
✓ should allow if caller list contains parent workflow ID
✓ should deny if caller list does not contain parent workflow ID (1 ms)
any caller policy
✓ should not throw
workflows-from-same-owner caller policy
✓ should deny if the two workflows are owned by different users (1 ms)
✓ should allow if both workflows are owned by the same user
```
...
#### How to test the change:
1. ...
## Issues fixed
Include links to Github issue or Community forum post or **Linear
ticket**:
> Important in order to close automatically and provide context to
reviewers
...
## Review / Merge checklist
- [ ] PR title and summary are descriptive. **Remember, the title
automatically goes into the changelog. Use `(no-changelog)` otherwise.**
([conventions](https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/blob/master/.github/pull_request_title_conventions.md))
- [ ] [Docs updated](https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n-docs) or follow-up
ticket created.
- [ ] Tests included.
> A bug is not considered fixed, unless a test is added to prevent it
from happening again. A feature is not complete without tests.
>
> *(internal)* You can use Slack commands to trigger [e2e
tests](https://www.notion.so/n8n/How-to-use-Test-Instances-d65f49dfc51f441ea44367fb6f67eb0a?pvs=4#a39f9e5ba64a48b58a71d81c837e8227)
or [deploy test
instance](https://www.notion.so/n8n/How-to-use-Test-Instances-d65f49dfc51f441ea44367fb6f67eb0a?pvs=4#f6a177d32bde4b57ae2da0b8e454bfce)
or [deploy early access version on
Cloud](https://www.notion.so/n8n/Cloudbot-3dbe779836004972b7057bc989526998?pvs=4#fef2d36ab02247e1a0f65a74f6fb534e).
## Summary
Ensure `ownedBy` and `sharedWith` are present and uniform for
credentials and workflows.
Details in story: https://linear.app/n8n/issue/PAY-987
Ensure all errors in `cli` are `ApplicationError` or children of it and
contain no variables in the message, to continue normalizing all the
errors we report to Sentry
Follow-up to: https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/pull/7839
Ensure all errors in `cli` inherit from `ApplicationError` to continue
normalizing all the errors we report to Sentry
Follow-up to: https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/pull/7820
This PR continues the effort of moving logic inside execution lifecycle
hooks into standalone testable functions, as a stepping stone to
refactoring the hooks themselves.
This PR introduces the following changes:
- New Vue stores: `collaborationStore` and `pushConnectionStore`
- Front-end push connection handling overhaul: Keep only a singe
connection open and handle it from the new store
- Add user avatars in the editor header when there are multiple users
working on the same workflow
- Sending a heartbeat event to back-end service periodically to confirm
user is still active
- Back-end overhauls (authored by @tomi):
- Implementing a cleanup procedure that removes inactive users
- Refactoring collaboration service current implementation
---------
Co-authored-by: Tomi Turtiainen <10324676+tomi@users.noreply.github.com>
Validate first and last names before saving them to database. This
should prevent security issue with un-sanitized data that ends up in
emails.
---------
Co-authored-by: कारतोफ्फेलस्क्रिप्ट™ <aditya@netroy.in>
Followup to #7566 | Story: https://linear.app/n8n/issue/PAY-926
### Manual workflow activation and deactivation
In a multi-main scenario, if the user manually activates or deactivates
a workflow, the process (whether leader or follower) that handles the
PATCH request and updates its internal state should send a message into
the command channel, so that all other main processes update their
internal state accordingly:
- Add to `ActiveWorkflows` if activating
- Remove from `ActiveWorkflows` if deactivating
- Remove and re-add to `ActiveWorkflows` if the update did not change
activation status.
After updating their internal state, if activating or deactivating, the
recipient main processes should push a message to all connected
frontends so that these can update their stores and so reflect the value
in the UI.
### Workflow activation errors
On failure to activate a workflow, the main instance should record the
error in Redis - main instances should always pull activation errors
from Redis in a multi-main scenario.
### Leadership change
On leadership change...
- The old leader should stop pruning and the new leader should start
pruning.
- The old leader should remove trigger- and poller-based workflows and
the new leader should add them.
This PR:
- Creates `InvitationController`
- Moves `POST /users` to `POST /invitations` and move related test to
`invitations.api.tests`
- Moves `POST /users/:id` to `POST /invitations/:id/accept` and move
related test to `invitations.api.tests`
- Adjusts FE to use new endpoints
- Moves all the invitation logic to the `UserService`
---------
Co-authored-by: कारतोफ्फेलस्क्रिप्ट™ <aditya@netroy.in>
- Enable two-way communication with web sockets
- Enable sending push messages to specific users
- Add collaboration service for managing active users for workflow
Missing things:
- State is currently kept only in memory, making this not work in
multi-master setups
- Removing a user from active users in situations where they go inactive
or we miss the "workflow closed" message
- I think a timer based solution for this would cover most edge cases.
I.e. have FE ping every X minutes, BE removes the user unless they have
received a ping in Y minutes, where Y > X
- FE changes to be added later by @MiloradFilipovic
Github issue / Community forum post (link here to close automatically):
---------
Co-authored-by: कारतोफ्फेलस्क्रिप्ट™ <aditya@netroy.in>
Story: https://linear.app/n8n/issue/PAY-926
This PR coordinates workflow activation on instance startup and on
leadership change in multiple main scenario in the internal API. Part 3
on manual workflow activation and deactivation will be a separate PR.
### Part 1: Instance startup
In multi-main scenario, on starting an instance...
- [x] If the instance is the leader, it should add webhooks, triggers
and pollers.
- [x] If the instance is the follower, it should not add webhooks,
triggers or pollers.
- [x] Unit tests.
### Part 2: Leadership change
In multi-main scenario, if the main instance leader dies…
- [x] The new main instance leader must activate all trigger- and
poller-based workflows, excluding webhook-based workflows.
- [x] The old main instance leader must deactivate all trigger- and
poller-based workflows, excluding webhook-based workflows.
- [x] Unit tests.
To test, start two instances and check behavior on startup and
leadership change:
```
EXECUTIONS_MODE=queue N8N_LEADER_SELECTION_ENABLED=true N8N_LICENSE_TENANT_ID=... N8N_LICENSE_ACTIVATION_KEY=... N8N_LOG_LEVEL=debug npm run start
EXECUTIONS_MODE=queue N8N_LEADER_SELECTION_ENABLED=true N8N_LICENSE_TENANT_ID=... N8N_LICENSE_ACTIVATION_KEY=... N8N_LOG_LEVEL=debug N8N_PORT=5679 npm run start
```
https://linear.app/n8n/issue/PAY-933/set-up-leader-selection-for-multiple-main-instances
- [x] Set up new envs
- [x] Add config and license checks
- [x] Implement `MultiMainInstancePublisher`
- [x] Expand `RedisServicePubSubPublisher` to support
`MultiMainInstancePublisher`
- [x] Init `MultiMainInstancePublisher` on startup and destroy on
shutdown
- [x] Add to sandbox plans
- [x] Test manually
Note: This is only for setup - coordinating in reaction to leadership
changes will come in later PRs.
This change ensures that things like `encryptionKey` and `instanceId`
are always available directly where they are needed, instead of passing
them around throughout the code.
This is related to an issue with how Bull handles stalled jobs, see
https://github.com/OptimalBits/bull/issues/1415 for reference.
CPU intensive workflows can in certain cases take a long while to finish
up, thereby blocking the thread and causing Bull queue to think the job
has stalled, even though it finished successfully. In these cases the
error handling could then overwrite the successful execution data with
the error message.
This fixes a bug in the pruning (soft-delete). The pruning was a bit too
aggressive, as it also pruned executions that weren't in an end state
yet. This only becomes an issue if there are long-running executions
(e.g. workflow with Wait node) or the prune parameters are set to keep
only a tiny number of executions.
This PR adds a message for queue mode which triggers an external secrets
provider reload inside the workers if the configuration has changed on
the main instance.
It also refactors some of the message handler code to remove cyclic
dependencies, as well as remove unnecessary duplicate redis clients
inside services (thanks to no more cyclic deps)
