# PR Title Convention We have very precise rules over how Pull Requests (to the `master` branch) must be formatted. This format basically follows the [Angular Commit Message Convention](https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit). It leads to easier to read commit history and allows for automated generation of release notes: A PR title consists of these elements: ``` (): │ │ │ │ │ └─⫸ Summary: In imperative present tense. | | Capitalized | | No period at the end. │ │ │ └─⫸ Scope: API|core|editor|* Node │ └─⫸ Type: build|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|test ``` - PR title - type - scope (*optional*) - summary - PR description - body (optional) - blank line - footer (optional) The structure looks like this: ### **Type** Must be one of the following: - `feat` - A new feature - `fix` - A bug fix - `perf` - A code change that improves performance - `test` - Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests - `docs` - Documentation only changes - `refactor` - A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature - `build` - Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm) - `ci` - Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (e.g. Github actions) If the prefix is `feat`, `fix` or `perf`, it will appear in the changelog. However if there is any BREAKING CHANGE (see Footer section below), the commit will always appear in the changelog. ### **Scope (optional)** The scope should specify the place of the commit change as long as the commit clearly addresses one of the following supported scopes. (Otherwise, omit the scope!) - `API` - changes to the *public* API - `core` - changes to the core / private API / backend of n8n - `editor` - changes to the Editor UI - `* Node` - changes to a specific node or trigger node (”`*`” to be replaced with the node name, not its display name), e.g. - mattermost → Mattermost Node - microsoftToDo → Microsoft To Do Node - n8n → n8n Node ### **Summary** The summary contains succinct description of the change: - use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes" - capitalize the first letter - *no* dot (.) at the end - do *not* include Linear ticket IDs etc. (e.g. N8N-1234) - suffix with “(no-changelog)” for commits / PRs that should not get mentioned in the changelog. ### **Body (optional)** Just as in the **summary**, use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes". The body should include the motivation for the change and contrast this with previous behavior. ### **Footer (optional)** The footer can contain information about breaking changes and deprecations and is also the place to [reference GitHub issues](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), Linear tickets, and other PRs that this commit closes or is related to. For example: ``` BREAKING CHANGE: Fixes # ``` or ``` DEPRECATED: Closes # ``` A Breaking Change section should start with the phrase "`BREAKING CHANGE:` " followed by a summary of the breaking change, a blank line, and a detailed description of the breaking change that also includes migration instructions. > 💡 A breaking change can additionally also be marked by adding a “`!`” to the header, right before the “`:`”, e.g. `feat(editor)!: Remove support for dark mode` > > This makes locating breaking changes easier when just skimming through commit messages. > 💡 The breaking changes must also be added to the [packages/cli/BREAKING-CHANGES.md](https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/blob/master/packages/cli/BREAKING-CHANGES.md) file located in the n8n repository. Similarly, a Deprecation section should start with "`DEPRECATED:` " followed by a short description of what is deprecated, a blank line, and a detailed description of the deprecation that also mentions the recommended update path. ### **Revert commits** If the commit reverts a previous commit, it should begin with `revert:` , followed by the header of the reverted commit. The content of the commit message body should contain: - information about the SHA of the commit being reverted in the following format: `This reverts commit `, - a clear description of the reason for reverting the commit message.