prometheus/tsdb/index/postings.go

773 lines
16 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

2017-04-10 11:59:45 -07:00
// Copyright 2017 The Prometheus Authors
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package index
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
import (
"container/heap"
"encoding/binary"
"runtime"
"sort"
"strings"
"sync"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pkg/labels"
)
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
var allPostingsKey = labels.Label{}
// AllPostingsKey returns the label key that is used to store the postings list of all existing IDs.
func AllPostingsKey() (name, value string) {
return allPostingsKey.Name, allPostingsKey.Value
}
// MemPostings holds postings list for series ID per label pair. They may be written
// to out of order.
// ensureOrder() must be called once before any reads are done. This allows for quick
// unordered batch fills on startup.
type MemPostings struct {
mtx sync.RWMutex
m map[string]map[string][]uint64
ordered bool
2016-12-10 00:44:00 -08:00
}
// NewMemPostings returns a memPostings that's ready for reads and writes.
func NewMemPostings() *MemPostings {
return &MemPostings{
m: make(map[string]map[string][]uint64, 512),
ordered: true,
}
}
// NewUnorderedMemPostings returns a memPostings that is not safe to be read from
// until ensureOrder was called once.
func NewUnorderedMemPostings() *MemPostings {
return &MemPostings{
m: make(map[string]map[string][]uint64, 512),
ordered: false,
}
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
// SortedKeys returns a list of sorted label keys of the postings.
func (p *MemPostings) SortedKeys() []labels.Label {
p.mtx.RLock()
keys := make([]labels.Label, 0, len(p.m))
for n, e := range p.m {
for v := range e {
keys = append(keys, labels.Label{Name: n, Value: v})
}
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
sort.Slice(keys, func(i, j int) bool {
if d := strings.Compare(keys[i].Name, keys[j].Name); d != 0 {
return d < 0
}
return keys[i].Value < keys[j].Value
})
return keys
}
// LabelNames returns all the unique label names.
func (p *MemPostings) LabelNames() []string {
p.mtx.RLock()
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
n := len(p.m)
if n == 0 {
return nil
}
names := make([]string, 0, n-1)
for name := range p.m {
if name != allPostingsKey.Name {
names = append(names, name)
}
}
return names
}
// LabelValues returns label values for the given name.
func (p *MemPostings) LabelValues(name string) []string {
p.mtx.RLock()
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
values := make([]string, 0, len(p.m[name]))
for v := range p.m[name] {
values = append(values, v)
}
return values
}
// PostingsStats contains cardinality based statistics for postings.
type PostingsStats struct {
CardinalityMetricsStats []Stat
CardinalityLabelStats []Stat
LabelValueStats []Stat
LabelValuePairsStats []Stat
}
// Stats calculates the cardinality statistics from postings.
func (p *MemPostings) Stats(label string) *PostingsStats {
const maxNumOfRecords = 10
var size uint64
p.mtx.RLock()
metrics := &maxHeap{}
labels := &maxHeap{}
labelValueLength := &maxHeap{}
labelValuePairs := &maxHeap{}
metrics.init(maxNumOfRecords)
labels.init(maxNumOfRecords)
labelValueLength.init(maxNumOfRecords)
labelValuePairs.init(maxNumOfRecords)
for n, e := range p.m {
if n == "" {
continue
}
labels.push(Stat{Name: n, Count: uint64(len(e))})
size = 0
for name, values := range e {
if n == label {
metrics.push(Stat{Name: name, Count: uint64(len(values))})
}
labelValuePairs.push(Stat{Name: n + "=" + name, Count: uint64(len(values))})
size += uint64(len(name))
}
labelValueLength.push(Stat{Name: n, Count: size})
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
return &PostingsStats{
CardinalityMetricsStats: metrics.get(),
CardinalityLabelStats: labels.get(),
LabelValueStats: labelValueLength.get(),
LabelValuePairsStats: labelValuePairs.get(),
}
}
// Get returns a postings list for the given label pair.
func (p *MemPostings) Get(name, value string) Postings {
var lp []uint64
p.mtx.RLock()
l := p.m[name]
if l != nil {
lp = l[value]
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
if lp == nil {
return EmptyPostings()
}
return newListPostings(lp...)
}
// All returns a postings list over all documents ever added.
func (p *MemPostings) All() Postings {
return p.Get(AllPostingsKey())
}
// EnsureOrder ensures that all postings lists are sorted. After it returns all further
// calls to add and addFor will insert new IDs in a sorted manner.
func (p *MemPostings) EnsureOrder() {
p.mtx.Lock()
defer p.mtx.Unlock()
if p.ordered {
return
}
n := runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0)
workc := make(chan []uint64)
var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(n)
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
go func() {
for l := range workc {
sort.Slice(l, func(a, b int) bool { return l[a] < l[b] })
}
wg.Done()
}()
}
for _, e := range p.m {
for _, l := range e {
workc <- l
}
}
close(workc)
wg.Wait()
p.ordered = true
}
// Delete removes all ids in the given map from the postings lists.
func (p *MemPostings) Delete(deleted map[uint64]struct{}) {
var keys, vals []string
// Collect all keys relevant for deletion once. New keys added afterwards
// can by definition not be affected by any of the given deletes.
p.mtx.RLock()
for n := range p.m {
keys = append(keys, n)
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
for _, n := range keys {
p.mtx.RLock()
vals = vals[:0]
for v := range p.m[n] {
vals = append(vals, v)
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
// For each posting we first analyse whether the postings list is affected by the deletes.
// If yes, we actually reallocate a new postings list.
for _, l := range vals {
// Only lock for processing one postings list so we don't block reads for too long.
p.mtx.Lock()
found := false
for _, id := range p.m[n][l] {
if _, ok := deleted[id]; ok {
found = true
break
}
}
if !found {
p.mtx.Unlock()
continue
}
repl := make([]uint64, 0, len(p.m[n][l]))
for _, id := range p.m[n][l] {
if _, ok := deleted[id]; !ok {
repl = append(repl, id)
}
}
if len(repl) > 0 {
p.m[n][l] = repl
} else {
delete(p.m[n], l)
}
p.mtx.Unlock()
}
p.mtx.Lock()
if len(p.m[n]) == 0 {
delete(p.m, n)
}
p.mtx.Unlock()
}
}
// Iter calls f for each postings list. It aborts if f returns an error and returns it.
func (p *MemPostings) Iter(f func(labels.Label, Postings) error) error {
p.mtx.RLock()
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
for n, e := range p.m {
for v, p := range e {
if err := f(labels.Label{Name: n, Value: v}, newListPostings(p...)); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}
return nil
}
// Add a label set to the postings index.
func (p *MemPostings) Add(id uint64, lset labels.Labels) {
p.mtx.Lock()
for _, l := range lset {
p.addFor(id, l)
}
p.addFor(id, allPostingsKey)
p.mtx.Unlock()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func (p *MemPostings) addFor(id uint64, l labels.Label) {
nm, ok := p.m[l.Name]
if !ok {
nm = map[string][]uint64{}
p.m[l.Name] = nm
}
list := append(nm[l.Value], id)
nm[l.Value] = list
if !p.ordered {
return
}
// There is no guarantee that no higher ID was inserted before as they may
// be generated independently before adding them to postings.
// We repair order violations on insert. The invariant is that the first n-1
// items in the list are already sorted.
for i := len(list) - 1; i >= 1; i-- {
if list[i] >= list[i-1] {
break
}
list[i], list[i-1] = list[i-1], list[i]
}
}
// ExpandPostings returns the postings expanded as a slice.
func ExpandPostings(p Postings) (res []uint64, err error) {
for p.Next() {
res = append(res, p.At())
}
return res, p.Err()
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
// Postings provides iterative access over a postings list.
type Postings interface {
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
// Next advances the iterator and returns true if another value was found.
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
Next() bool
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
// Seek advances the iterator to value v or greater and returns
// true if a value was found.
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
Seek(v uint64) bool
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
2017-01-02 04:27:52 -08:00
// At returns the value at the current iterator position.
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
At() uint64
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
// Err returns the last error of the iterator.
Err() error
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
// errPostings is an empty iterator that always errors.
type errPostings struct {
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
err error
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
func (e errPostings) Next() bool { return false }
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
func (e errPostings) Seek(uint64) bool { return false }
func (e errPostings) At() uint64 { return 0 }
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
func (e errPostings) Err() error { return e.err }
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
var emptyPostings = errPostings{}
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
// EmptyPostings returns a postings list that's always empty.
// NOTE: Returning EmptyPostings sentinel when index.Postings struct has no postings is recommended.
// It triggers optimized flow in other functions like Intersect, Without etc.
func EmptyPostings() Postings {
return emptyPostings
}
// ErrPostings returns new postings that immediately error.
func ErrPostings(err error) Postings {
return errPostings{err}
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
// Intersect returns a new postings list over the intersection of the
// input postings.
func Intersect(its ...Postings) Postings {
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
if len(its) == 0 {
return EmptyPostings()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2017-06-12 23:25:13 -07:00
if len(its) == 1 {
return its[0]
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
for _, p := range its {
if p == EmptyPostings() {
return EmptyPostings()
}
}
return newIntersectPostings(its...)
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
type intersectPostings struct {
arr []Postings
cur uint64
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
}
func newIntersectPostings(its ...Postings) *intersectPostings {
return &intersectPostings{arr: its}
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
func (it *intersectPostings) At() uint64 {
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
return it.cur
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func (it *intersectPostings) doNext() bool {
Loop:
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
for {
for _, p := range it.arr {
if !p.Seek(it.cur) {
return false
}
if p.At() > it.cur {
it.cur = p.At()
continue Loop
}
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
}
return true
}
}
func (it *intersectPostings) Next() bool {
for _, p := range it.arr {
if !p.Next() {
return false
}
if p.At() > it.cur {
it.cur = p.At()
}
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
}
return it.doNext()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
func (it *intersectPostings) Seek(id uint64) bool {
it.cur = id
return it.doNext()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
func (it *intersectPostings) Err() error {
for _, p := range it.arr {
if p.Err() != nil {
return p.Err()
}
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
}
return nil
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
}
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
// Merge returns a new iterator over the union of the input iterators.
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
func Merge(its ...Postings) Postings {
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
if len(its) == 0 {
return EmptyPostings()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2017-06-12 23:25:13 -07:00
if len(its) == 1 {
return its[0]
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
p, ok := newMergedPostings(its)
if !ok {
return EmptyPostings()
}
return p
}
type postingsHeap []Postings
func (h postingsHeap) Len() int { return len(h) }
func (h postingsHeap) Less(i, j int) bool { return h[i].At() < h[j].At() }
func (h *postingsHeap) Swap(i, j int) { (*h)[i], (*h)[j] = (*h)[j], (*h)[i] }
func (h *postingsHeap) Push(x interface{}) {
*h = append(*h, x.(Postings))
}
func (h *postingsHeap) Pop() interface{} {
old := *h
n := len(old)
x := old[n-1]
*h = old[0 : n-1]
return x
}
type mergedPostings struct {
Spelling (#6517) * spelling: alertmanager Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: attributes Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: autocomplete Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: bootstrap Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: caught Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: chunkenc Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: compaction Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: corrupted Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: deletable Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: expected Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: fine-grained Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: initialized Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: iteration Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: javascript Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: multiple Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: number Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: overlapping Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: possible Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: postings Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: procedure Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: programmatic Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: queuing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: querier Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: repairing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: received Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: reproducible Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: retention Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: sample Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: segements Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: semantic Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: software [LICENSE] Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: staging Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: timestamp Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: unfortunately Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: uvarint Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: subsequently Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: ressamples Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
h postingsHeap
initialized bool
cur uint64
err error
}
func newMergedPostings(p []Postings) (m *mergedPostings, nonEmpty bool) {
ph := make(postingsHeap, 0, len(p))
for _, it := range p {
// NOTE: mergedPostings struct requires the user to issue an initial Next.
if it.Next() {
ph = append(ph, it)
} else {
if it.Err() != nil {
return &mergedPostings{err: it.Err()}, true
}
}
}
if len(ph) == 0 {
return nil, false
}
return &mergedPostings{h: ph}, true
}
func (it *mergedPostings) Next() bool {
if it.h.Len() == 0 || it.err != nil {
return false
}
// The user must issue an initial Next.
Spelling (#6517) * spelling: alertmanager Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: attributes Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: autocomplete Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: bootstrap Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: caught Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: chunkenc Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: compaction Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: corrupted Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: deletable Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: expected Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: fine-grained Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: initialized Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: iteration Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: javascript Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: multiple Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: number Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: overlapping Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: possible Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: postings Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: procedure Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: programmatic Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: queuing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: querier Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: repairing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: received Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: reproducible Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: retention Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: sample Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: segements Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: semantic Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: software [LICENSE] Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: staging Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: timestamp Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: unfortunately Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: uvarint Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: subsequently Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: ressamples Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
if !it.initialized {
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595) The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting lists. Adjust benchmark to catch this. Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore. Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7): ``` benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68% benchmark old allocs new allocs delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48% benchmark old bytes new bytes delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99% ``` Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
heap.Init(&it.h)
it.cur = it.h[0].At()
Spelling (#6517) * spelling: alertmanager Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: attributes Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: autocomplete Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: bootstrap Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: caught Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: chunkenc Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: compaction Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: corrupted Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: deletable Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: expected Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: fine-grained Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: initialized Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: iteration Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: javascript Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: multiple Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: number Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: overlapping Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: possible Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: postings Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: procedure Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: programmatic Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: queuing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: querier Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: repairing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: received Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: reproducible Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: retention Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: sample Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: segements Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: semantic Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: software [LICENSE] Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: staging Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: timestamp Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: unfortunately Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: uvarint Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: subsequently Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: ressamples Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
it.initialized = true
return true
}
for {
cur := it.h[0]
if !cur.Next() {
heap.Pop(&it.h)
if cur.Err() != nil {
it.err = cur.Err()
return false
}
if it.h.Len() == 0 {
return false
}
} else {
// Value of top of heap has changed, re-heapify.
heap.Fix(&it.h, 0)
}
if it.h[0].At() != it.cur {
it.cur = it.h[0].At()
return true
}
}
}
func (it *mergedPostings) Seek(id uint64) bool {
if it.h.Len() == 0 || it.err != nil {
return false
}
Spelling (#6517) * spelling: alertmanager Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: attributes Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: autocomplete Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: bootstrap Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: caught Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: chunkenc Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: compaction Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: corrupted Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: deletable Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: expected Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: fine-grained Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: initialized Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: iteration Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: javascript Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: multiple Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: number Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: overlapping Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: possible Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: postings Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: procedure Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: programmatic Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: queuing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: querier Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: repairing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: received Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: reproducible Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: retention Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: sample Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: segements Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: semantic Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: software [LICENSE] Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: staging Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: timestamp Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: unfortunately Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: uvarint Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: subsequently Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: ressamples Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
if !it.initialized {
if !it.Next() {
return false
}
}
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595) The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting lists. Adjust benchmark to catch this. Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore. Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7): ``` benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68% benchmark old allocs new allocs delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48% benchmark old bytes new bytes delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99% ``` Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
for it.cur < id {
cur := it.h[0]
if !cur.Seek(id) {
heap.Pop(&it.h)
if cur.Err() != nil {
it.err = cur.Err()
return false
}
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595) The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting lists. Adjust benchmark to catch this. Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore. Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7): ``` benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68% benchmark old allocs new allocs delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48% benchmark old bytes new bytes delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99% ``` Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
if it.h.Len() == 0 {
return false
}
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595) The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting lists. Adjust benchmark to catch this. Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore. Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7): ``` benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68% benchmark old allocs new allocs delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48% benchmark old bytes new bytes delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99% ``` Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
} else {
// Value of top of heap has changed, re-heapify.
heap.Fix(&it.h, 0)
}
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595) The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting lists. Adjust benchmark to catch this. Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore. Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7): ``` benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68% benchmark old allocs new allocs delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48% benchmark old bytes new bytes delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99% ``` Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
it.cur = it.h[0].At()
}
return true
}
func (it mergedPostings) At() uint64 {
return it.cur
}
func (it mergedPostings) Err() error {
return it.err
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
}
// Without returns a new postings list that contains all elements from the full list that
// are not in the drop list.
func Without(full, drop Postings) Postings {
if full == EmptyPostings() {
return EmptyPostings()
}
if drop == EmptyPostings() {
return full
}
return newRemovedPostings(full, drop)
}
type removedPostings struct {
full, remove Postings
cur uint64
initialized bool
fok, rok bool
}
func newRemovedPostings(full, remove Postings) *removedPostings {
return &removedPostings{
full: full,
remove: remove,
}
}
func (rp *removedPostings) At() uint64 {
return rp.cur
}
func (rp *removedPostings) Next() bool {
if !rp.initialized {
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
rp.rok = rp.remove.Next()
rp.initialized = true
}
for {
if !rp.fok {
return false
}
if !rp.rok {
rp.cur = rp.full.At()
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
return true
}
fcur, rcur := rp.full.At(), rp.remove.At()
if fcur < rcur {
rp.cur = fcur
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
return true
} else if rcur < fcur {
// Forward the remove postings to the right position.
rp.rok = rp.remove.Seek(fcur)
} else {
// Skip the current posting.
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
}
}
}
func (rp *removedPostings) Seek(id uint64) bool {
if rp.cur >= id {
return true
}
rp.fok = rp.full.Seek(id)
rp.rok = rp.remove.Seek(id)
rp.initialized = true
return rp.Next()
}
func (rp *removedPostings) Err() error {
if rp.full.Err() != nil {
return rp.full.Err()
}
return rp.remove.Err()
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
// ListPostings implements the Postings interface over a plain list.
type ListPostings struct {
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
list []uint64
cur uint64
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func NewListPostings(list []uint64) Postings {
return newListPostings(list...)
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
func newListPostings(list ...uint64) *ListPostings {
return &ListPostings{list: list}
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
func (it *ListPostings) At() uint64 {
return it.cur
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
func (it *ListPostings) Next() bool {
if len(it.list) > 0 {
it.cur = it.list[0]
it.list = it.list[1:]
return true
}
it.cur = 0
return false
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
func (it *ListPostings) Seek(x uint64) bool {
// If the current value satisfies, then return.
if it.cur >= x {
return true
}
if len(it.list) == 0 {
return false
}
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
// Do binary search between current position and end.
i := sort.Search(len(it.list), func(i int) bool {
return it.list[i] >= x
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
})
if i < len(it.list) {
it.cur = it.list[i]
it.list = it.list[i+1:]
return true
}
it.list = nil
return false
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
func (it *ListPostings) Err() error {
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
return nil
}
// bigEndianPostings implements the Postings interface over a byte stream of
// big endian numbers.
type bigEndianPostings struct {
list []byte
cur uint32
}
func newBigEndianPostings(list []byte) *bigEndianPostings {
return &bigEndianPostings{list: list}
}
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
func (it *bigEndianPostings) At() uint64 {
return uint64(it.cur)
}
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Next() bool {
if len(it.list) >= 4 {
it.cur = binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list)
it.list = it.list[4:]
return true
}
return false
}
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Seek(x uint64) bool {
if uint64(it.cur) >= x {
return true
}
num := len(it.list) / 4
// Do binary search between current position and end.
i := sort.Search(num, func(i int) bool {
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
return binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list[i*4:]) >= uint32(x)
})
if i < num {
j := i * 4
it.cur = binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list[j:])
it.list = it.list[j+4:]
return true
}
it.list = nil
return false
}
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Err() error {
return nil
}