mirror of
https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus.git
synced 2024-12-26 06:04:05 -08:00
A few spelling corrections. (#2960)
This commit is contained in:
parent
2a9ca394dd
commit
5a19ffb315
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ what makes a good SD and covers some of the common implementation issues.
|
|||
|
||||
The first question to be asked is does it make sense to add this particular
|
||||
SD? An SD mechanism should be reasonably well established, and at a minimum in
|
||||
use across multiple orgnaisations. It should allow discovering of machines
|
||||
use across multiple organisations. It should allow discovering of machines
|
||||
and/or services running somewhere. When exactly an SD is popular enough to
|
||||
justify being added to Prometheus natively is an open question.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ discovery. In that case the SD you should be looking at is whatever decides
|
|||
that a machine is going to be a Kafka server, likely a machine database or
|
||||
configuration management system.
|
||||
|
||||
If something is particlarly custom or unusual, `file_sd` is the generic
|
||||
If something is particularly custom or unusual, `file_sd` is the generic
|
||||
mechanism provided for users to hook in. Generally with Prometheus we offer a
|
||||
single generic mechanism for things with infinite variations, rather than
|
||||
trying to support everything natively (see also, alertmanager webhook, remote
|
||||
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ instead.
|
|||
|
||||
For configuration management systems like Chef, while they do have a
|
||||
database/API that'd in principle make sense to talk to for service discovery,
|
||||
the idomatic approach is to use Chef's templating facilities to write out a
|
||||
the idiomatic approach is to use Chef's templating facilities to write out a
|
||||
file for use with `file_sd`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ may only contain `[_a-zA-Z0-9]`, sanitize by replacing with underscores as neede
|
|||
|
||||
For targets with multiple potential ports, you can a) expose them as a list, b)
|
||||
if they're named expose them as a map or c) expose them each as their own
|
||||
target. Kuberenetes SD takes the target per port approach. a) and b) can be
|
||||
target. Kubernetes SD takes the target per port approach. a) and b) can be
|
||||
combined.
|
||||
|
||||
For machine-like SDs (OpenStack, EC2, Kubernetes to some extent) there may
|
||||
|
@ -99,9 +99,9 @@ whatever functionality the SD itself offers.
|
|||
It is a general rule with Prometheus that all configuration comes from the
|
||||
configuration file. While the libraries you use to talk to the SD may also
|
||||
offer other mechanisms for providing configuration/authentication under the
|
||||
covers (EC2's use of enviroment variables being a prime example), using your SD
|
||||
covers (EC2's use of environment variables being a prime example), using your SD
|
||||
mechanism should not require this. Put another way, your SD implementation
|
||||
should not read enviroment variables or files to obtain configuration.
|
||||
should not read environment variables or files to obtain configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
Some SD mechanisms have rate limits that make them challenging to use. As an
|
||||
example we have unfortunately had to reject Amazon ECS service discovery due to
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue