[ENHANCEMENT] Relabeling: small speed-up of hashmod
Code optimization: The relabel operation is used very frequently, and strconv.FormatInt() with better performance should be used.
If `cfg.TargetLabel` is a template like `$1`, it won't match any labels,
so no point calling `lb.Del` with it.
Similarly if `target` is not a valid label name, it won't match any
labels, so don't call with that either.
The intention seems to have been that a blank _value_ would delete the
target, so change that code to use `target` instead of `cfg.TargetLabel`.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Thought this would be a nice check on the `Validate()` function, but
some of the test cases needed tweaking to pass.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
For `Lowercase`, `KeepEqual`, etc., we do not expand a regexp, so
the target label name must not contain anything like `${1}`.
Also for the common case that the `Replace` target does not require any
template expansion, check that the entire string passes label name
validity rules.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* labels: respect Set after Del in Builder
The implementations are not symmetric between `Set()` and `Del()`, so
we must be careful. Add tests for this, both in labels and in relabel
where the issue was reported.
Also make the slice implementation consistent re `slices.Contains`.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
It took a `Labels` where the memory could be re-used, but in practice
this hardly ever benefitted. Especially after converting `relabel.Process`
to `relabel.ProcessBuilder`.
Comparing the parameter to `nil` was a bug; `EmptyLabels` is not `nil`
so the slice was reallocated multiple times by `append`.
Lastly `Builder.Labels()` now estimates that the final size will depend
on labels added and deleted.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Save work converting between Builder and Labels.
Also expose ProcessBuilder, so callers can supply a Builder.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Previous code was effectively doing BigEndian.Uint64, so call that and save time.
An md5.Sum result is always 16 bytes. The first 8 are not used in the result, just as before.
Signed-off-by: Renning Bruns <ren@renmail.net>
* model/relabel: Add benchmark
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: re-use Builder across relabels
Saves memory allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* labels.Builder: allow re-use of result slice
This reduces memory allocations where the caller has a suitable slice available.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: re-use source values slice
To reduce memory allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Unwind one change causing test failures
Restore original behaviour in PopulateLabels, where we must not overwrite the input set.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* relabel: simplify values optimisation
Use a stack-based array for up to 16 source labels, which will be the
vast majority of cases.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* lint
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Drop extra string held in relabel.Regexp struct
Signed-off-by: Paschalis Tsilias <paschalist0@gmail.com>
* Use slice operations instead of TrimPrefix/TrimSuffix; Override String() method
Signed-off-by: Paschalis Tsilias <paschalist0@gmail.com>
This creates a new `model` directory and moves all data-model related
packages over there:
exemplar labels relabel rulefmt textparse timestamp value
All the others are more or less utilities and have been moved to `util`:
gate logging modetimevfs pool runtime
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
