Rationale: The default value for GOGC is 100, i.e. a garbage collected
is initialized once as many heap space has been allocated as was in
use after the last GC was done. This ratio doesn't make a lot of sense
in Prometheus, as typically about 60% of the heap is allocated for
long-lived memory chunks (most of which are around for many hours if
not days). Thus, short-lived heap objects are accumulated for quite
some time until they finally match the large amount of memory used by
bulk memory chunks and a gigantic GC cyle is invoked. With GOGC=40, we
are essentially reinstating "normal" GC behavior by acknowledging that
about 60% of the heap are used for long-term bulk storage.
The median Prometheus production server at SoundCloud runs a GC cycle
every 90 seconds. With GOGC=40, a GC cycle is run every 35 seconds
(which is still not very often). However, the effective RAM usage is
now reduced by about 30%. If settings are updated to utilize more RAM,
the time between GC cycles goes up again (as the heap size is larger
with more long-lived memory chunks, but the frequency of creating
short-lived heap objects does not change). On a quite busy large
Prometheus server, the timing changed from one GC run every 20s to one
GC run every 12s.
In the former case (just changing GOGC, leave everything else as it
is), the CPU usage increases by about 10% (on a mid-size referenc
server from 8.1 to 8.9). If settings are adjusted, the CPU
consumptions increases more drastically (from 8 cores to 13 cores on a
large reference server), despite GCs happening more rarely, presumably
because a 50% larger set of memory chunks is managed now. Having more
memory chunks is good in many regards, and most servers are running
out of memory long before they run out of CPU cycles, so the tradeoff
is overwhelmingly positive in most cases.
Power users can still set the GOGC environment variable as usual, as
the implementation in this commit honors an explicitly set variable.
The staticcheck warns about testing.T usage in goroutines. Moving the
t.Fatal* calls to the main thread showed immediately that this is a good
practice, as one of the test setups didn't work.
* Fixed int64 overflow for timestamp in v1/api parseDuration and parseTime
This led to unexpected results on wrong query with "(...)&start=148966367200.372&end=1489667272.372"
That query is wrong because of `start > end` but actually internal int64 overflow caused start to be something around MinInt64 (huge negative value) and was passing validation.
BTW: Not sure if negative timestamp makes sense even.. But model.Earliest is actually MinInt64, can someone explain me why?
Signed-off-by: Bartek Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
* Added missing trailing periods on comments.
Signed-off-by: Bartek Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
* MOved to only `<` and `>`. Removed equal.
Signed-off-by: Bartek Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
