This "brings back" protobuf parsing, with the only goal to play with
the new sparse histograms.
The Prom-2.x style parser is highly adapted to the structure of the
Prometheus text format (and later OpenMetrics). Some jumping through
hoops is required to feed protobuf into it.
This is not meant to be a model for the final implementation. It
should just enable sparse histogram ingestion at a reasonable
efficiency.
Following known shortcomings and flaws:
- No tests yet.
- Summaries and legacy histograms, i.e. without sparse buckets, are
ignored.
- Staleness doesn't work (but this could be fixed in the appender, to
be discussed).
- No tricks have been tried that would be similar to the tricks the
text parsers do (like direct pointers into the HTTP response
body). That makes things weird here. Tricky optimizations only make
sense once the final format is specified, which will almost
certainly not be the old protobuf format. (Interestingly, I expect
this implementation to be in fact much more efficient than the
original protobuf ingestion in Prom-1.x.)
- This is using a proto3 version of metrics.proto (mostly to be
consistent with the other protobuf uses). However, proto3 sees no
difference between an unset field. We depend on that to distinguish
between an unset timestamp and the timestamp 0 (1970-01-01, 00:00:00
UTC). In this experimental code, we just assume that timestamp is
never specified and therefore a timestamp of 0 always is interpreted
as "not set".
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
i) Uses the more idiomatic Wrap and Wrapf methods for creating nested errors.
ii) Fixes some incorrect usages of fmt.Errorf where the error messages don't have any formatting directives.
iii) Does away with the use of fmt package for errors in favour of pkg/errors
Signed-off-by: tariqibrahim <tariq181290@gmail.com>
* promparse: sort all labels when parsing
Some label names might start with an uppercase letter in which case it
needs to come before __name__. Without this it means that we are not
maintaining the same invariant that all label names should be sorted in
such cases.
Amend the tests to check this problem automatically. Without the change
the tests do not pass.
Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedriuswork@gmail.com>
This is based on the existing parser, and has slightly better
performance (few %) than it.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
Pass content type down to text parser.
Add layer of indirection in front of text parser,
and rename to avoid future clashes.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
