mudhorn/prometheus
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus.git synced 2024-12-26 06:04:05 -08:00
Code Issues Actions 3 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
7332 commits 243 branches 444 tags 649 MiB
Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Brian Brazil 767fa704b6 Load only some offsets into the symbol table into memory. 
Rather than keeping the entire symbol table in memory, keep every nth
offset and walk from there to the entry we need. This ends up slightly
slower, ~360ms per 1M series returned from PostingsForMatchers which is
not much considering the rest of the CPU such a query would go on to
use.

Make LabelValues use the postings tables, rather than having
to do symbol lookups. Use yoloString, as PostingsForMatchers
doesn't need the strings to stick around and adjust the API
call to keep the Querier open until it's all marshalled.

Remove allocatedSymbols memory optimisation, we no longer keep all the
symbol strings in heap memory. Remove LabelValuesFor and LabelIndices,
they're dead code. Ensure we've still tests for label indices,
and add missing test that we can work with old V1 Format index files.

PostingForMatchers performance is slightly better, with a big drop in
allocation counts due to using yoloString for LabelValues:

benchmark                                                               old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              36698         36681         -0.05%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      522786        560887        +7.29%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      511652        537680        +5.09%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     522102        564239        +8.07%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            113689911     111795919     -1.67%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            135825572     132871085     -2.18%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              40782628      38038181      -6.73%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              31267869      29194327      -6.63%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              112733329     111568823     -1.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       112868153     111232029     -1.45%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        31338257      29349446      -6.35%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                32054482      29972436      -6.50%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              136504654     133968442     -1.86%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             27960350      27264997      -2.49%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       136765564     133860724     -2.12%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     163714583     159453668     -2.60%

benchmark                                                               old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              6              6              +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      11             11             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      11             11             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     17             15             -11.76%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            100012         12             -99.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            200040         100040         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              200045         100045         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              200041         100041         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              100017         17             -99.98%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       100023         23             -99.98%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        200046         100046         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                200050         100050         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              200049         100049         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             111150         11150          -89.97%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       200055         100055         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     311238         111238         -64.26%

benchmark                                                               old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              296           296           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      424           424           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      424           424           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     552           1544          +179.71%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            1600482       1606125       +0.35%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            17259065      17264709      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              17259150      17264780      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              17259048      17264680      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              1600610       1606242       +0.35%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       1600813       1606434       +0.35%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        17259176      17264808      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                17259304      17264936      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              17259333      17264965      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             3142628       3148262       +0.18%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       17259509      17265141      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     20405680      20416944      +0.06%

However overall Select performance is down and involves more allocs, due to
having to do more than a simple map lookup to resolve a symbol and that all the strings
returned are allocated:

benchmark                                           old ns/op     new ns/op      delta
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1of1000000-4           506092636     862678244      +70.46%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10of1000000-4          505638968     860917636      +70.26%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100of1000000-4         505229450     882150048      +74.60%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000of1000000-4        515905414     862241115      +67.13%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10000of1000000-4       516785354     874841110      +69.29%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100000of1000000-4      540742808     907030187      +67.74%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000000of1000000-4     815224288     1181236903     +44.90%

benchmark                                           old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1of1000000-4           4000020        6000020        +50.00%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10of1000000-4          4000038        6000038        +50.00%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100of1000000-4         4000218        6000218        +50.00%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000of1000000-4        4002018        6002018        +49.97%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10000of1000000-4       4020018        6020018        +49.75%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100000of1000000-4      4200018        6200018        +47.62%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000000of1000000-4     6000018        8000019        +33.33%

benchmark                                           old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1of1000000-4           176001468     227201476     +29.09%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10of1000000-4          176002620     227202628     +29.09%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100of1000000-4         176014140     227214148     +29.09%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000of1000000-4        176129340     227329348     +29.07%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10000of1000000-4       177281340     228481348     +28.88%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100000of1000000-4      188801340     240001348     +27.12%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000000of1000000-4     304001340     355201616     +16.84%

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
 2019-12-17 18:56:58 +00:00
Brian Brazil aff9f7a9e8 Extend PostingsForMatchers benchmark to cover Blocks too. 
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
 2019-12-11 19:59:31 +00:00
Krasimir Georgiev 549164f252
return err instead of panic for corrupted chunk (#6040) 
* Fix tsdb panic when querying corrupted chunks.
check that the chunk segment has enough data to read all chunk pieces.
* refactor, simplify and add tests.
* simpfiy WriteChunks implementation

Signed-off-by: Krasi Georgiev <8903888+krasi-georgiev@users.noreply.github.com>
 2019-12-04 09:37:49 +02:00
Tom Wilkie de0a772b8e Port tsdb to use pkg/labels. (#6326) 
* Port tsdb to use pkg/labels.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com>

* Get tests passing.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com>

* Remove useless cast.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com>

* Appease linters.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com>

* Fix review comments

Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
 2019-11-18 11:53:33 -08:00
Dipack P Panjabi ce7bab04dd Compute WAL size and use it during retention size checks (#5886) 
* Compute WAL size and account for it when applying the retention settings.

Signed-off-by: Dipack P Panjabi <dpanjabi@hudson-trading.com>
 2019-11-12 09:40:16 +07:00
Bartek Plotka f0863a604e Removed extra tsdb/testutil after merge. 
Signed-off-by: Bartek Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
 2019-08-14 10:12:32 +01:00
Ganesh Vernekar 5ecef3542d
Cleanup after merging tsdb into prometheus 
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
 2019-08-13 14:04:14 +05:30
Ganesh Vernekar 7cf09b0395
Moving tsdb into its own subdirectory 
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
 2019-08-13 13:58:49 +05:30
Renamed from block_test.go (Browse further)