the tests fail to do `range labels.Labels` on CI
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolás Pazos <npazosmendez@gmail.com>
instead of having multiple flags, plus add new formats for testing
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolás Pazos <npazosmendez@gmail.com>
Header name is `Retry-Attempt`, only set when >0.
Signed-off-by: Marc Tuduri <marctc@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paschalis Tsilias <paschalis.tsilias@grafana.com>
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
In storage/remote, try converting to RecoverableError using errors.As,
instead of through direct casting.
Signed-off-by: Arve Knudsen <arve.knudsen@gmail.com>
* adapt code.go and write_handler.go to support float histograms
* adapt watcher.go to support float histograms
* wip adapt queue_manager.go to support float histograms
* address comments for metrics in queue_manager.go
* set test cases for queue manager
* use same counts for histograms and float histograms
* refactor createHistograms tests
* fix float histograms ref in watcher_test.go
* address PR comments
Signed-off-by: Marc Tuduri <marctc@protonmail.com>
`QueueManager.externalLabels` becomes a slice rather than a `Labels` so
we can index into it when doing the merge operation.
Note we avoid calling `Labels.Len()` in `labelProtosToLabels()`.
It isn't necessary - `append()` will enlarge the buffer and we're
expecting to re-use it many times.
Also, we now validate protobuf input before converting to Labels.
This way we can detect errors first, and we don't place unnecessary
requirements on the Labels structure.
Re-do seriesFilter using labels.Builder (albeit N^2).
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
The wlog.WL type can now be used to create a Write Ahead Log or a Write
Behind Log.
Before the prefix for wbl metrics was
'prometheus_tsdb_out_of_order_wal_' and has been replaced with
'prometheus_tsdb_out_of_order_wbl_'.
Signed-off-by: Jesus Vazquez <jesus.vazquez@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Vazquez <jesusvazquez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
