* WIP implement WAL watcher reading via notifications over a channel from
the TSDB code
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Notify via head appenders Commit (finished all WAL logging) rather than
on each WAL Log call
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Fix misspelled Notify plus add a metric for dropped Write notifications
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Update tests to handle new notification pattern
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* this test maybe needs more time on windows?
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* does this test need more time on windows as well?
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* read timeout is already a time.Duration
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* remove mistakenly commited benchmark data files
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* address some review feedback
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* fix missed changes from previous commit
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Fix issues from wrapper function
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* try fixing race condition in test by allowing tests to overwrite the
read ticker timeout instead of calling the Notify function
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* fix linting
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
The storage.ChunkSeries iterator assumes that a histogram sample can always be
appended to the currently open chunk. This is not the case when there is a counter reset,
or when appending a stale sample to a chunk with non-stale samples. In addition, the open chunk sometimes
needs to be recoded before a sample can be appended.
This commit addresses the issue by implementing a RecodingAppender which can recode incoming
samples in a transparent way. It also detects cases when a sample cannot be appended at all and
returns `false` so that the caller can open a new chunk.
Signed-off-by: Filip Petkovski <filip.petkovsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: György Krajcsovits <gyorgy.krajcsovits@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: György Krajcsovits <gyorgy.krajcsovits@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
We haven't updated golint-ci in our CI yet, but this commit prepares
for that.
There are a lot of new warnings, and it is mostly because the "revive"
linter got updated. I agree with most of the new warnings, mostly
around not naming unused function parameters (although it is justified
in some cases for documentation purposes – while things like mocks are
a good example where not naming the parameter is clearer).
I'm pretty upset about the "empty block" warning to include `for`
loops. It's such a common pattern to do something in the head of the
`for` loop and then have an empty block. There is still an open issue
about this: https://github.com/mgechev/revive/issues/810 I have
disabled "revive" altogether in files where empty blocks are used
excessively, and I have made the effort to add individual
`// nolint:revive` where empty blocks are used just once or twice.
It's borderline noisy, though, but let's go with it for now.
I should mention that none of the "empty block" warnings for `for`
loop bodies were legitimate.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Rabenhorst <sebastian.rabenhorst@shopify.com>
Fixed sampleRingIterator for mixed histograms
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Rabenhorst <sebastian.rabenhorst@shopify.com>
Fixed lint
This commit is doing what I would have expected that Go generics do
for me. However, the PromQL benchmarks show a significant runtime and
allocation increase with `genericAdd`, so this replaces it with
hand-coded non-generic versions of it.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
In the past, every sample value was a float, so it was fine to call a
variable holding such a float "value" or "sample". With native
histograms, a sample might have a histogram value. And a histogram
value is still a value. Calling a float value just "value" or "sample"
or "V" is therefore misleading. Over the last few commits, I already
renamed many variables, but this cleans up a few more places where the
changes are more invasive.
Note that we do not to attempt naming in the JSON APIs or in the
protobufs. That would be quite a disruption. However, internally, we
can call variables as we want, and we should go with the option of
avoiding misunderstandings.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
This utilizes the fact that most sampleRings will only contain samples
of one type. In this case, the generic interface is circumvented, and
a bespoke buffer for the one actually occurring sample type is
used. Should a sampleRing receive a sample of a different kind later,
it will transparently switch to the generic behavior.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
Previously, we had one “polymorphous” `sample` type in the `storage`
package. This commit breaks it up into `fSample`, `hSample`, and
`fhSample`, each still implementing the `tsdbutil.Sample` interface.
This reduces allocations in `sampleRing.Add` but inflicts the penalty
of the interface wrapper, which makes things worse in total.
This commit therefore just demonstrates the step taken. The next
commit will tackle the interface overhead problem.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
It took a `Labels` where the memory could be re-used, but in practice
this hardly ever benefitted. Especially after converting `relabel.Process`
to `relabel.ProcessBuilder`.
Comparing the parameter to `nil` was a bug; `EmptyLabels` is not `nil`
so the slice was reallocated multiple times by `append`.
Lastly `Builder.Labels()` now estimates that the final size will depend
on labels added and deleted.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
During remote write, we call url.String() twice:
- to add the Endpoint() to the span
- to actually know where whe should send the request
This value does not change over time, and it's not really that
lightweight to calculate. I wrote this simple benchmark:
func BenchmarkURLString(b *testing.B) {
u, err := url.Parse("https://remote.write.com/api/v1")
require.NoError(b, err)
b.Run("string", func(b *testing.B) {
count := 0
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
count += len(u.String())
}
})
}
And the results are ~200ns/op, 80B/op, 3 allocs/op.
Yes, we're going to go to the network here, which is a huge amount of
resources compared to this, but still, on agents that send 500 requests
per second, that is 1500 wasteful allocations per second.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
In storage/remote, try converting to RecoverableError using errors.As,
instead of through direct casting.
Signed-off-by: Arve Knudsen <arve.knudsen@gmail.com>
As far as I understand it, we'd never expect to receive a nil span,
and remote.spansProtoToSpans would panic if we received a nil span.
Marking the fields as non-nullable also means the generated Golang
code doesn't use pointers for these fields, reducing allocations.
Signed-off-by: Charles Korn <charles.korn@grafana.com>
This is a bit more conservative than we could be. As long as a chunk
isn't the first in a block, we can be pretty sure that the previous
chunk won't disappear. However, the incremental gain of returning
NotCounterReset in these cases is probably very small and might not be
worth the code complications.
Wwith this, we now also pay attention to an explicitly set counter
reset during ingestion. While the case doesn't show up in practice
yet, there could be scenarios where the metric source knows there was
a counter reset even if it might not be visible from the values in the
histogram. It is also useful for testing.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
