When the label name is empty, which can happen now with quoted label
name, it should be quoted when printed as a string again.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Implement histogram statistics decoder
This commit speeds up histogram_count and histogram_sum
functions on native histograms. The idea is to have separate decoders which can be
used by the engine to only read count/sum values from histogram objects. This should help
with reducing allocations when decoding histograms, as well as with speeding up aggregations
like sum since they will be done on floats and not on histogram objects.
Signed-off-by: Filip Petkovski <filip.petkovsky@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Filip Petkovski <filip.petkovsky@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthony Mirabella <a9@aneurysm9.com>
When the label name of a matcher contains non-standard characters, like
a dot, or starts with a digit, it should be quoted.
If it's not quoted, then `VectorSelector.String()` isn't a valid PromQL.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* process custom values in histogram unit test framework
* check for warnings when evaluating in unit test framework
* add test cases for custom buckets in test framework
Signed-off-by: Jeanette Tan <jeanette.tan@grafana.com>
The check fell into "this matcher equals vector selector's name" case when vector selector doesn't have a name and the matcher is an explicit matcher for an empty __name__ label.
To provide some context about why this is important: some downstream projects use the promql.Parse(expr.String()) to clone an expression's AST, and with this bug that matcher disappears in the cloning.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
In a previous PR, the generated parser was created using an old version of goyacc.
Also adds -l to disable line directives, which fixes debug processing and reduces diffs at the expense of making it more difficult to reason about the generated output.
Signed-off-by: Owen Williams <owen.williams@grafana.com>
includes Inf and NaN as numbers to histogram
---------
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Gartia <neerajgartia211002@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Björn Rabenstein <github@rabenste.in>
Co-authored-by: Björn Rabenstein <github@rabenste.in>
The strings produced by these tests can run to thousands of characters,
which makes test logs difficult to read.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* add custom buckets to native histogram model
* simple copy for custom bounds
* return errors for unsupported add/sub operations
* add test cases for string and update appendhistogram in scrape to account for new schema
* check fields which are supposed to be unused but may affect results in equals
* allow appending custom buckets histograms regardless of max schema
Signed-off-by: Jeanette Tan <jeanette.tan@grafana.com>
This adds support for the new grammar of `{"metric_name", "l1"="val"}` to promql and some of the exposition formats.
This grammar will also be valid for non-UTF-8 names.
UTF-8 names will not be considered valid unless model.NameValidationScheme is changed.
This does not update the go expfmt parser in text_parse.go, which will be addressed by https://github.com/prometheus/common/issues/554/.
Part of https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/issues/13095
Signed-off-by: Owen Williams <owen.williams@grafana.com>
Conditions are ANDed inside the same matcher but matchers are ORed
Including unit tests for "promtool tsdb dump".
Refactor some matchers scraping utils.
Signed-off-by: machine424 <ayoubmrini424@gmail.com>
This PR adds an Experimental flag to the functions.
This can be used by https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/13059
but also xrate and other future functions.
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@o11y.eu>
Return annotations (warnings and infos) from PromQL queries
This generalizes the warnings we have already used before (but only for problems with remote read) as "annotations".
Annotations can be warnings or infos (the latter could be false positives). We do not treat them different in the API for now and return them all as "warnings". It would be easy to distinguish them and return infos separately, should that appear useful in the future.
The new annotations are then used to create a lot of warnings or infos during PromQL evaluations. Partially these are things we have wanted for a long time (e.g. inform the user that they have applied `rate` to a metric that doesn't look like a counter), but the new native histograms have created even more needs for those annotations (e.g. if a query tries to aggregate float numbers with histograms).
The annotations added here are not yet complete. A prominent example would be a warning about a range too short for a rate calculation. But such a warnings is more tricky to create with good fidelity and we will tackle it later.
Another TODO is to take annotations into account when evaluating recording rules.
---------
Signed-off-by: Jeanette Tan <jeanette.tan@grafana.com>
promql: Extend testing framework to support native histograms
This includes both the internal testing framework as well as the rules unit test feature of promtool.
This also adds a bunch of basic tests. Many of the code level tests can now be converted to tests within the framework, and more tests can be added easily.
---------
Signed-off-by: Harold Dost <h.dost@criteo.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregor Zeitlinger <gregor.zeitlinger@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Lang <stephen.lang@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Harold Dost <h.dost@criteo.com>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Lang <stephen.lang@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Gregor Zeitlinger <gregor.zeitlinger@grafana.com>
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
