We haven't updated golint-ci in our CI yet, but this commit prepares
for that.
There are a lot of new warnings, and it is mostly because the "revive"
linter got updated. I agree with most of the new warnings, mostly
around not naming unused function parameters (although it is justified
in some cases for documentation purposes – while things like mocks are
a good example where not naming the parameter is clearer).
I'm pretty upset about the "empty block" warning to include `for`
loops. It's such a common pattern to do something in the head of the
`for` loop and then have an empty block. There is still an open issue
about this: https://github.com/mgechev/revive/issues/810 I have
disabled "revive" altogether in files where empty blocks are used
excessively, and I have made the effort to add individual
`// nolint:revive` where empty blocks are used just once or twice.
It's borderline noisy, though, but let's go with it for now.
I should mention that none of the "empty block" warnings for `for`
loop bodies were legitimate.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
It took a `Labels` where the memory could be re-used, but in practice
this hardly ever benefitted. Especially after converting `relabel.Process`
to `relabel.ProcessBuilder`.
Comparing the parameter to `nil` was a bug; `EmptyLabels` is not `nil`
so the slice was reallocated multiple times by `append`.
Lastly `Builder.Labels()` now estimates that the final size will depend
on labels added and deleted.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Common service discovery mechanisms such as Kubernetes can generate a
lot of target groups, so this function was allocating a lot of memory
which then immediately became garbage. Re-using the structures across
an entire Sync saves effort.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: Add benchmark
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: re-use Builder across relabels
Saves memory allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* labels.Builder: allow re-use of result slice
This reduces memory allocations where the caller has a suitable slice available.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: re-use source values slice
To reduce memory allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Unwind one change causing test failures
Restore original behaviour in PopulateLabels, where we must not overwrite the input set.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* relabel: simplify values optimisation
Use a stack-based array for up to 16 source labels, which will be the
vast majority of cases.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* lint
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* refactor: move from io/ioutil to io and os packages
* use fs.DirEntry instead of os.FileInfo after os.ReadDir
Signed-off-by: MOREL Matthieu <matthieu.morel@cnp.fr>
This creates a new `model` directory and moves all data-model related
packages over there:
exemplar labels relabel rulefmt textparse timestamp value
All the others are more or less utilities and have been moved to `util`:
gate logging modetimevfs pool runtime
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
We are re-enabling HTTP 2 again. There has been a few bugfixes upstream
in go, and we have also enabled ReadIdleTimeout.
Fix#7588Fix#9068
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@inuits.eu>
* Testify: move to require
Moving testify to require to fail tests early in case of errors.
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@inuits.eu>
* More moves
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@inuits.eu>
This also fixes a bug in query_log_file, which now is relative to the config file like all other paths.
Signed-off-by: Andy Bursavich <abursavich@gmail.com>
Related to eb93c684d4
See,
$ make lint
>> running golangci-lint
GO111MODULE=on go list -e -compiled -test=true -export=false -deps=true -find=false -tags= -- ./... > /dev/null
GO111MODULE=on /home/mt/go/packages/bin/golangci-lint run ./...
scrape/target_test.go:260:2: SA1019: tlsConfig.BuildNameToCertificate is deprecated: NameToCertificate only allows associating a single certificate with a given name. Leave that field nil to let the library select the first compatible chain from Certificates. (staticcheck)
tlsConfig.BuildNameToCertificate()
^
scrape/target_test.go:357:2: SA1019: tlsConfig.BuildNameToCertificate is deprecated: NameToCertificate only allows associating a single certificate with a given name. Leave that field nil to let the library select the first compatible chain from Certificates. (staticcheck)
tlsConfig.BuildNameToCertificate()
^
make: *** [Makefile.common:181: common-lint] Error 1
$ go version
go version go1.14 linux/amd64
Signed-off-by: Mario Trangoni <mjtrangoni@gmail.com>
* Update go.mod dependencies before release
Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <julius.volz@gmail.com>
* Add issue for showing query warnings in promtool
Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <julius.volz@gmail.com>
* Revert json-iterator back to 1.1.6
It produced errors when marshaling Point values with special float
values.
Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <julius.volz@gmail.com>
* Fix expected step values in promtool tests after client_golang update
Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <julius.volz@gmail.com>
* Update generated protobuf code after proto dep updates
Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <julius.volz@gmail.com>
* scrape: Add global jitter for HA server
Covers issue in https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/4926#issuecomment-449039848
where the HA setup become a problem for targets unable to be scraped simultaneously.
The new jitter per server relies on the hostname and external labels which necessarily to be uniq.
As before, scrape offset will be calculated with regard the absolute time, so even
restart/reload doesn't change scrape time per scrape target + prometheus instance.
Use fqdn if possible, otherwise fall back to the hostname. It adds extra random seed
to calculate server hash to be distinguish on machines with the same hostname, but
different DC.
Signed-off-by: Aleksei Semiglazov <xjewer@gmail.com>
Although it is spelling mistakes, it might make an affects
while reading.
Co-Authored-By: Kim Bao Long longkb@vn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Nguyen Hai Truong <truongnh@vn.fujitsu.com>
