API consumers should be able to get insight into the query run times.
The UI currently measures total roundtrip times. This PR allows for more
fine grained metrics to be exposed.
* adds new timer for total execution time (queue + eval)
* expose new timer, queue timer, and eval timer in stats field of the
range query response:
```json
{
"status": "success",
"data": {
"resultType": "matrix",
"result": [],
"stats": {
"execQueueTimeNs": 4683,
"execTotalTimeNs": 2086587,
"totalEvalTimeNs": 2077851
}
}
}
```
* stats field is optional, only set when query parameter `stats` is not
empty
Try it via
```sh
curl 'http://localhost:9090/api/v1/query_range?query=up&start=1486480279&end=1486483879&step=14000&stats=true'
```
Review feedback
* moved query stats json generation to query_stats.go
* use seconds for all query timers
* expose all timers available
* Changed ExecTotalTime string representation from Exec queue total time to Exec total time
This PR fixes#3072 by providing POST endpoints for `query` and `query_range`.
POST request must be made with `Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded` header.
* Re-add contexts to storage.Storage.Querier()
These are needed when replacing the storage by a multi-tenant
implementation where the tenant is stored in the context.
The 1.x query interfaces already had contexts, but they got lost in 2.x.
* Convert promql.Engine to use native contexts
This PR adds the `/status/config` endpoint which exposes the currently
loaded Prometheus config. This is the same config that is displayed on
`/config` in the UI in YAML format. The response payload looks like
such:
```
{
"status": "success",
"data": {
"yaml": <CONFIG>
}
}
```
* Use request.Context() instead of a global map of contexts.
* Add some basic opentracing instrumentation on the query path.
* Remove tracehandler endpoint.
* Fixed int64 overflow for timestamp in v1/api parseDuration and parseTime
This led to unexpected results on wrong query with "(...)&start=148966367200.372&end=1489667272.372"
That query is wrong because of `start > end` but actually internal int64 overflow caused start to be something around MinInt64 (huge negative value) and was passing validation.
BTW: Not sure if negative timestamp makes sense even.. But model.Earliest is actually MinInt64, can someone explain me why?
Signed-off-by: Bartek Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
* Added missing trailing periods on comments.
Signed-off-by: Bartek Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
* MOved to only `<` and `>`. Removed equal.
Signed-off-by: Bartek Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
retreival.Target contains a mutex. It was copied in the Targets()
call. This potentially can wreak a lot of havoc.
It might even have caused the issues reported as #2266 and #2262 .
