Relates to @bboreham optimization in https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/10859
Bryan did reduce the sleep time improving the deltas on the benchmark by
quite a lot. However I've been working on a similar implementation for
out of order and I noticed that we actually get into this method
thousands of times.
@ywwg had the brilliant idea of not always sleeping before the select
but actually make it a case in the select so we only sleep if we need
to.
The benchmark deltas are amazing
```
❯ benchstat old_implementation.txt new_implementation_using_time_after.txt
name old time/op new time/op delta
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=100,samplesPerSeries=7200,exemplarsPerSeries=0,mmappedChunkT=0-8 521ms ±25% 253ms ± 6% -51.47% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=100,samplesPerSeries=7200,exemplarsPerSeries=36,mmappedChunkT=0-8 773ms ± 3% 369ms ±31% -52.23% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=100,samplesPerSeries=7200,exemplarsPerSeries=72,mmappedChunkT=0-8 592ms ±28% 297ms ±28% -49.80% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=100,samplesPerSeries=7200,exemplarsPerSeries=360,mmappedChunkT=0-8 547ms ± 2% 999ms ±187% ~ (p=0.690 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=10000,samplesPerSeries=50,exemplarsPerSeries=0,mmappedChunkT=0-8 11.3s ± 4% 1.3s ±44% -88.48% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=10000,samplesPerSeries=50,exemplarsPerSeries=2,mmappedChunkT=0-8 11.1s ± 1% 1.2s ±20% -89.08% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=1000,samplesPerSeries=480,exemplarsPerSeries=0,mmappedChunkT=0-8 1.24s ± 3% 0.18s ± 7% -85.76% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=1000,samplesPerSeries=480,exemplarsPerSeries=2,mmappedChunkT=0-8 1.24s ± 2% 0.18s ± 5% -85.24% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=1000,samplesPerSeries=480,exemplarsPerSeries=5,mmappedChunkT=0-8 1.23s ± 5% 0.27s ±33% -77.73% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=10,seriesPerBatch=1000,samplesPerSeries=480,exemplarsPerSeries=24,mmappedChunkT=0-8 1.28s ± 1% 0.36s ± 7% -71.51% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=100,seriesPerBatch=1000,samplesPerSeries=480,exemplarsPerSeries=0,mmappedChunkT=3800-8 12.1s ± 1% 3.1s ± 6% -74.33% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=100,seriesPerBatch=1000,samplesPerSeries=480,exemplarsPerSeries=2,mmappedChunkT=3800-8 12.1s ± 1% 3.4s ± 4% -71.94% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=100,seriesPerBatch=1000,samplesPerSeries=480,exemplarsPerSeries=5,mmappedChunkT=3800-8 12.1s ± 1% 3.8s ±17% -68.35% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
LoadWAL/batches=100,seriesPerBatch=1000,samplesPerSeries=480,exemplarsPerSeries=24,mmappedChunkT=3800-8 12.4s ± 1% 4.0s ±18% -67.71% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
```
Benchmarked on Linux
```
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/tsdb
cpu: 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz
```
Signed-off-by: Jesus Vazquez <jesus.vazquez@grafana.com>
* Job queue
This PR reimplements chan chunkWriteJob with custom buffered queue that should use less memory, because it doesn't preallocate entire buffer for maximum queue size at once. Instead it allocates individual "segments" with smaller size.
As elements are added to the queue, they fill individual segments. When elements are removed from the queue (and segments), empty segments can be thrown away. This doesn't change memory usage of the queue when it's full, but should decrease its memory footprint when it's empty (queue will keep max 1 segment in such case).
Signed-off-by: Peter Štibraný <pstibrany@gmail.com>
* Modify test to work with low resolution timer.
Signed-off-by: Peter Štibraný <pstibrany@gmail.com>
* Improve comments.
Signed-off-by: Peter Štibraný <pstibrany@gmail.com>
* dont waste space on the chunkRefMap
* add time factor
* add comments
* better readability
* add instrumentation and more comments
* formatting
* uppercase comments
* Address review feedback. Renamed "free" to "shrink" everywhere, updated comments and threshold to 1000.
* double space
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Peter Štibraný <pstibrany@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
To avoid building up data in memory, commit and make a new appender
periodically.
The number `commitAfter = 10000` was chosen arbitrarily; testing with
10x more or less gives slightly worse results.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
When restarting Prometheus I sometimes see:
caller=db.go:832 level=error component=tsdb msg="compaction failed" err="compact head: persist head block: 2 errors: populate block: context canceled; context canceled"
And prometheus_tsdb_compactions_failed_total metric gets incremented.
This makes it more difficult to write alerts based on
prometheus_tsdb_compactions_failed_total metric since any restart can
trigger it.
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Mierzwa <l.mierzwa@gmail.com>
The code sleeps for a short time to allow goroutines to finish, however
it seems the duration can be reduced a lot, speeding up the reading
process.
I checked using some WAL data from production, and the queue is almost
always empty at the time we enter `waitForIdle()` so there is no danger
of spinning in the tight loop.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Instead of creating a new hashing object every time, call `crc32.Checksum`
which computes the answer without allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Rename walDir parameter to dir
Signed-off-by: Matej Gera <matejgera@gmail.com>
* Improve NewQueueManager comment
Signed-off-by: Matej Gera <matejgera@gmail.com>
This commit fixes a typo when reporting an error that the the symbols
table size has been exceeded.
Signed-off-by: Filip Petkovski <filip.petkovsky@gmail.com>
On macOS, the TestTombstoneCleanRetentionLimitsRace performs very
poorly. It takes more than a second to write out one block, and as it
writes 400 of them, we run into the 10-minute test timeout frequently.
While this doesn't fix the actual performance issue, breaking each
iteration into a subtest makes the test pass reliably (because each
iteration comfortably finishes in under a minute).
Related report: https://groups.google.com/g/prometheus-developers/c/jxQ6Ayg6VJ4/m/03H_DS9PDAAJ
Signed-off-by: Matthias Rampke <matthias@prometheus.io>
"Labels is a sorted set of labels. Order has to be guaranteed upon
instantiation." says the comment, so fix all the tests that break this
rule.
For `BenchmarkLabelValuesWithMatchers()` and
`BenchmarkHeadLabelValuesWithMatchers()` the amount of work done changes
significantly if you put the labels in order, because all series refs
get neatly partitioned by the `tens` label, so I renamed the labels
to maintain the previous behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* refactor: move from io/ioutil to io and os packages
* use fs.DirEntry instead of os.FileInfo after os.ReadDir
Signed-off-by: MOREL Matthieu <matthieu.morel@cnp.fr>
* Add a test with variable samples rate append
This test overflows the chunk created in memseries, and the total amount
of samples in the (only) mmapped chunk is 29, instead of the 65565
appended ones.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Cut new chunk when rate prediction was wrong
When appending samples at a slow rate, and then appending at a higher
rate, the prediction we made to cut a new chunk is no longer valid.
Sometimes this can even cause an overflow in the chunk, if more samples
than uint16 can hold are appended.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Improve comment on 2*samplesPerChunk
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Assert that all chunks have less than 240 samples
Also, trigger new chunk at 240, not at more than 240
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* tsdb/agent: Ignore duplicate exemplars
Signed-off-by: Paschalis Tsilias <paschalist0@gmail.com>
* Make each exemplar unique in TestCommit
Signed-off-by: Paschalis Tsilias <paschalist0@gmail.com>
* Re-Trigger CI for Windows and UI-related steps
Signed-off-by: Paschalis Tsilias <paschalist0@gmail.com>
* Change test comment to properly re-trigger pipeline
Signed-off-by: Paschalis Tsilias <paschalist0@gmail.com>
* Defer Close() calls for test agent and segment reader
Signed-off-by: Paschalis Tsilias <paschalist0@gmail.com>
* tsdb/agent: port grafana/agent#676grafana/agent#676 fixed an issue where a loading a WAL with multiple
segments may result in ref ID collision. The starting ref ID for new
series should be set to the highest ref ID across all series records
from all WAL segments.
This fixes an issue where the starting ref ID was incorrectly set to the
highest ref ID found in the newest segment, which may not have any ref
IDs at all if no series records have been appended to it yet.
Signed-off-by: Robert Fratto <robertfratto@gmail.com>
* tsdb/agent: update terminology (s/ref ID/nextRef)
Signed-off-by: Robert Fratto <robertfratto@gmail.com>
* tsdb: avoid slice-to-interface allocation in EnsureOrder
This is pulling the `seriesRefSlice` out of the loop, so the compiler
doesn't allocate a new one on the heap every time.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* tsdb: use pointer type in Pool for EnsureOrder
As noted by staticcheck, Pool prefers the objects in the pool to have
pointer type. This is a little more fiddly to code, but avoids
allocation of a wrapper object every time a slice is put into the pool.
Removed a comment that said fixing this has a performance penalty: not
borne out by benchmarks.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Run gofumpt on all files
Getting golangci-lint errors when building on my laptop, possibly because I have newer version of gofumpt then what it was formatted with.
Run gofumpt -w -extra on all files as it will be needed in the future anyway.
* Update golangci-lint to v1.44.2
v1.44.0 upgraded gofumpt so bumping version in CI will help keep formatting correct for everyone
* Address golangci-lint error
Getting 'error-strings: error strings should not be capitalized or end with punctuation or a newline' from revive here.
Drop new line.
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Mierzwa <l.mierzwa@gmail.com>
* tsdb/agent: Fix deadlock from simultaneous GC and write
This commit fixes a potential deadlock where storing in-memory series
references could deadlock with a WAL GC cycle.
Signed-off-by: Robert Fratto <robertfratto@gmail.com>
* add missing license header
Signed-off-by: Robert Fratto <robertfratto@gmail.com>
* order local imports
Signed-off-by: Robert Fratto <robertfratto@gmail.com>
* align deadlock testing with discovery/manager_test.go method
Also prevents GCs from running concurrently, which could also cause a
deadlock (even though it's currently impossible for two GCs to run
concurrently).
Signed-off-by: Robert Fratto <robertfratto@gmail.com>
* Write chunks via queue, predicting the refs
Our load tests have shown that there is a latency spike in the
remote write handler whenever the head chunks need to be written,
because chunkDiskMapper.WriteChunk() blocks until the chunks are written
to disk.
This adds a queue to the chunk disk mapper which makes the WriteChunk()
method non-blocking unless the queue is full. Reads can still be served
from the queue.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* address PR feeddback
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* initialize metrics without .Add(0)
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* change isRunningMtx to normal lock
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* do not re-initialize chunkrefmap
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* update metric outside of lock scope
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* add benchmark for adding job to chunk write queue
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* remove unnecessary "success" var
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* gofumpt -extra
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* avoid WithLabelValues call in addJob
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* format comments
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* addressing PR feedback
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* rename cutExpectRef to cutAndExpectRef
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* use head.Init() instead of .initTime()
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* address PR feedback
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* PR feedback
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* update test according to PR feedback
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* replace callbackWg -> awaitCb
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* better test of truncation with empty files
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
* replace callbackWg -> awaitCb
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
Unexported postingsWithIndexHeap's methods that don't need to be
exported, and added detailed comments.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* tsdb: fix exemplar benchmarks
Go benchmarks are expected to do an amount of work that varies with
the `b.N` parameter. Previously these benchmarks would report a result
like 0.01 ns/op, which is nonsense.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* tsdb: use simpler map key to improve exemplar perf
Prometheus holds an index of exemplars so it can discard the oldest one
for a series when a new one is added.
Since the keys are not for human eyes, we can use a simpler format
and save the effort of quoting label values.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Exemplars: allocate index map with estimated size
This avoids Go having to re-size the map several times as it grows.
16 exemplars per series is a guess; if it is too low then the map will
be sparse, while if it is too high then the map will have to resize once
or twice.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
See this comment for detailed explanation:
https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/9907#issuecomment-1002189932
TL;DR: if we don't call Pop() on the heap implementation, we don't need
to return our param as an `interface{}` so we save an allocation.
This would be popped for every label value, so it can be thousands of
saved allocations here (see benchmarks).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>