* Query Log: add origin of the rules
We don't set rule name and rule kind because the added value would be
quite low, given we have now the file, the group and the query.
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@inuits.eu>
With the next release of client_golang, Summaries will not have
objectives by default. To not lose the objectives we have right now,
explicitly state the current default objectives.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
* Working group name
Signed-off-by: Pritam Bhudia <pritam.bhudia@baesystems.com>
* Working categorised by group name
Signed-off-by: Pritam Bhudia <pritam.bhudia@baesystems.com>
* Changed group sorting in web
Signed-off-by: Pritam Bhudia <pritam.bhudia@baesystems.com>
* Fixed group sorting and comments
Signed-off-by: Pritam Bhudia <pritam.bhudia@baesystems.com>
* Fixed group sorting and comments with gofmt
Signed-off-by: Pritam Bhudia <pritam.bhudia@baesystems.com>
* Added file and group name
Signed-off-by: Pritam Bhudia <pritam.bhudia@baesystems.com>
* reverted back to full path to yml file
Signed-off-by: Pritam Bhudia <pritam.bhudia@baesystems.com>
i) Uses the more idiomatic Wrap and Wrapf methods for creating nested errors.
ii) Fixes some incorrect usages of fmt.Errorf where the error messages don't have any formatting directives.
iii) Does away with the use of fmt package for errors in favour of pkg/errors
Signed-off-by: tariqibrahim <tariq181290@gmail.com>
* reload: copy state on both name and labels
Fix https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/issues/5193
Using just name causes the linked issue - if new rules are inserted with
the same name (but different labels), the reordering will cause stale
markers to be inserted in the next eval for all shifted rules, despite
them not being stale.
Ideally we want to avoid stale markers for time series that still exist
in the new rules, with name and labels being the unique identifer.
This change adds labels to the internal map when copying the old rule
data to the new rule data. This prevents the problem of staling rules
that simply shifted order.
If labels change, it is a new time series and the old series will stale
regardless. So it should be safe to always match on name and labels when
copying state.
Signed-off-by: James Ravn <james@r-vn.org>
The previous code was defective in that it never sorted groups within a
file due to doing a multi-key sort incorrectly.
Signed-off-by: David Symonds <dsymonds@gmail.com>
* Add evaluationTimestamp (Last Evaluation) column to display on /rules
Signed-off-by: Will Hegedus <wbhegedus@liberty.edu>
* Add lastScrapeDuration ("Scrape Duration") to display on /targets
Signed-off-by: Will Hegedus <wbhegedus@liberty.edu>
* Updates based on Julius' feedback
Signed-off-by: Will Hegedus <wbhegedus@liberty.edu>
* Update to set timestamp to when eval started (after eval completes)
Signed-off-by: Will Hegedus <wbhegedus@liberty.edu>
* Update /rules to display time since last evaluation
Signed-off-by: Will Hegedus <wbhegedus@liberty.edu>
* Re-order Last Eval/Eval Time to be consistent with targets page
Signed-off-by: Will Hegedus <wbhegedus@liberty.edu>
There are many more (mostly finalizers like Close/Stop/etc.), but most of
the others seemed like one couldn't do much about them anyway.
Signed-off-by: Julius Volz <julius.volz@gmail.com>
* adding information about the health and errors for Rules
adding Health() and LastError() to the Rule interface. This will allow
us to easily surface information about rules.
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* updating rules.html with fields for Rule errors and health state
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* fix code comment grammar & access Rule health/error info using a mutex
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* s/Errors/Error/ in rules.html to remain consistent with targets.html
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* adding periods to code comments in reporting/alerting
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* putting health/error below mutex in struct field
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
This adds a parameter to the storage selection interface which allows
query engine(s) to pass information about the operations surrounding a
data selection.
This can for example be used by remote storage backends to infer the
correct downsampling aggregates that need to be provided.
Clicking on a rule, either the name or the expression, opens the rule
result (or the corresponding expression, repsectively) in the
expression browser. This should by default happen in the console tab,
as, more often than not, displaying it in the graph tab runs into a
timeout.
* Move fingerprint to Hash()
* Move away from tsdb.MultiError
* 0777 -> 0666 for files
* checkOverflow of extra fields
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
Usually rules don't more around, and if they do it's likely
that rules/alerts with the same name stay in the same order.
If rules/alerts with the same name are added/removed this
could cause a blip for one cycle, but this is unavoidable
without requiring rule and alert names to be unique - which we don't
want to do.
In case the execution of all rules takes longer than the configured rule
evaluation interval, one or more iterations will be skipped. This needs
to be visible to the opterator.
This is based on https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/1997.
This adds contexts to the relevant Storage methods and already passes
PromQL's new per-query context into the storage's query methods.
The immediate motivation supporting multi-tenancy in Frankenstein, but
this could also be used by Prometheus's normal local storage to support
cancellations and timeouts at some point.
For Weaveworks' Frankenstein, we need to support multitenancy. In
Frankenstein, we initially solved this without modifying the promql
package at all: we constructed a new promql.Engine for every
query and injected a storage implementation into that engine which would
be primed to only collect data for a given user.
This is problematic to upstream, however. Prometheus assumes that there
is only one engine: the query concurrency gate is part of the engine,
and the engine contains one central cancellable context to shut down all
queries. Also, creating a new engine for every query seems like overkill.
Thus, we want to be able to pass per-query contexts into a single engine.
This change gets rid of the promql.Engine's built-in base context and
allows passing in a per-query context instead. Central cancellation of
all queries is still possible by deriving all passed-in contexts from
one central one, but this is now the responsibility of the caller. The
central query context is now created in main() and passed into the
relevant components (web handler / API, rule manager).
In a next step, the per-query context would have to be passed to the
storage implementation, so that the storage can implement multi-tenancy
or other features based on the contextual information.
So far, out-of-order samples during rule evaluation were not logged,
and neither scrape health samples. The latter are unlikely to cause
any errors. That's why I'm logging them always now. (It's alway highly
irregular should it happen.) For rules, I have used the same plumbing
as for samples, just with a different wording in the message to mark
them as a result of rule evaluation.
This considers static labels in the equality of alerts to
avoid falsely copying state from a different alert definition with
the same name across reloads.
To be safe, it also copies the state map rather than just its pointer
so that remaining collisions disappear after one evaluation interval.
This gives up on the idea to communicate throuh the Append() call (by
either not returning as it is now or returning an error as
suggested/explored elsewhere). Here I have added a Throttled() call,
which has the advantage that it can be called before a whole _batch_
of Append()'s. Scrapes will happen completely or not at all. Same for
rule group evaluations. That's a highly desired behavior (as discussed
elsewhere). The code is even simpler now as the whole ingestion buffer
could be removed.
Logging of throttled mode has been streamlined and will create at most
one message per minute.
When an evaluation group runs initially, it waits a deterministic
amount of time. During that time it also has to accept
a termination singnal so shutdown doesn't hang during the first
evaluation iteration after a configuration reload.
Fixes#1307
