If we are populating series for a subquery then set the interval
parameter accordingly so that downstream users could use that
information.
Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@vinted.com>
Use new experimental package `golang.org/x/exp/slices`.
slices.Sort works on values that are directly comparable, like ints,
so avoids the overhad of an interface call to `.Less()`.
Left tests unchanged, because they don't need the speed and it may be
a cross-check that slices.Sort gives the same answer.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: Add benchmark
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: re-use Builder across relabels
Saves memory allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* labels.Builder: allow re-use of result slice
This reduces memory allocations where the caller has a suitable slice available.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: re-use source values slice
To reduce memory allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Unwind one change causing test failures
Restore original behaviour in PopulateLabels, where we must not overwrite the input set.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* relabel: simplify values optimisation
Use a stack-based array for up to 16 source labels, which will be the
vast majority of cases.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* lint
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
We print the stacktrace of a panic when query causes one, but there's no
information about the query itself, which makes it harder to debug and
reproduce the issue.
This adds the 'expr' string to the logged panic.
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Mierzwa <l.mierzwa@gmail.com>
* Labels: create signature with/without labels
Instead of creating a new Labels slice then converting to signature,
go directly to the signature and save time.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Labels: refactor Builder tests
Have one test with a range of cases, and have them check the final
output rather than checking the internal structure of the Builder.
Also add a couple of cases where the value is "", which should be
interpreted as 'delete'.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Labels: add 'Keep' function to Builder
This lets us replace `Labels.WithLabels` with the more general `Builder`.
In `engine.resultMetric()` we can call `Keep()` instead of checking
and calling `Del()`.
Avoid calling `Sort()` in `Builder.Labels()` if we didn't add anything,
so that `Keep()` has the same performance as `WithLabels()`.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
This exactly corresponds to the statistic compared against MaxSamples
during the course of query execution, so users can see how close their
queries are to a limit.
Co-authored-by: Harkishen Singh <harkishensingh@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Bloomgarden <blmgrdn@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bloomgarden <blmgrdn@amazon.com>
We always track total samples queried and add those to the standard set
of stats queries can report.
We also allow optionally tracking per-step samples queried. This must be
enabled both at the engine and query level to be tracked and rendered.
The engine flag is exposed via a Prometheus feature flag, while the
query flag is set when stats=all.
Co-authored-by: Alan Protasio <approtas@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Bloomgarden <blmgrdn@amazon.com>
Co-authored-by: Harkishen Singh <harkishensingh@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bloomgarden <blmgrdn@amazon.com>
This follows the line of argument that the invariant of not looking
ahead of the query time was merely emerging behavior and not a
documented stable feature. Any query that looks ahead of the query
time was simply invalid before the introduction of the negative offset
and the @ modifier.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
`BufferedSeriesIterator` and `MemoizedSeriesIterator` use a method
called `Values` for exactly the purpose for which all other iterators
of the same kind use a method called `At`. That alone is confusing,
but on top of that, the `Values` method only returns a single sample,
not multiple values. I assume the naming has historical reasons. This
commit makes it more consistent. It is now easier to read, and now
`BufferedSeriesIterator` and `MemoizedSeriesIterator` implement
`chunkenc.Iterator` like many other iterators, too.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
* Add test case to showcase the problem in #9590
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jackson <jacksontj.89@gmail.com>
* Don't unwrap ParenExpr in newStepInvariantExpr
Fixes#9590
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jackson <jacksontj.89@gmail.com>
This creates a new `model` directory and moves all data-model related
packages over there:
exemplar labels relabel rulefmt textparse timestamp value
All the others are more or less utilities and have been moved to `util`:
gate logging modetimevfs pool runtime
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
* promql: copy data when short-circuiting
Because the range query loop re-uses the output buffer each time round,
we must copy results into the buffer rather than using input as output.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Add benchmark case for many-to-one join
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* query_range: compute join signatures just once
For an expression like `a + on(p,q) b`, extract the `p,q` part from each
series once, instead of re-computing at every step of the range.
Although there was a cache, computing the key by concatenating all
labels was expensive.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Add benchmark for query_range with topk
Modify sample data so values within a metric differ
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Optimise topk where k==1
In this case we don't need a heap to keep track of values; just a single
slot is fine.
Simplify the initialization of the heap: since all cases start off as a
single-item heap we can just assign the value directly.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Allow at least one slot in results for topk, quantile
k isn't set for quantile, but we need space to start collecting values
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
In the previous version, 1.18.0, the "megacheck" linter paid attention
to the '//lint:ignore' comment, but that is no longer there.
Newer version pay attention to '//nolint:<linter>,<linter>,...'
comments, optionally followed by a "second" comment introduced by '//'.
Update the directives to use this style.
This is related to prometheus/blackbox_exporter#738 and
prometheus/blackbox_exporter#745.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo E. Magallon <marcelo.magallon@grafana.com>
This commit adds `@ <timestamp>` modifier as per this design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uSbD3T2beM-iX4-Hp7V074bzBRiRNlqUdcWP6JTDQSs/edit.
An example query:
```
rate(process_cpu_seconds_total[1m])
and
topk(7, rate(process_cpu_seconds_total[1h] @ 1234))
```
which ranks based on last 1h rate and w.r.t. unix timestamp 1234 but actually plots the 1m rate.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
* promql: Removed global and add ability to have better interval for subqueries if not specified
## Changes
* Refactored tests for better hints testing
* Added various TODO in places to enhance.
* Moved DefaultEvalInterval global to opts with func(rangeMillis int64) int64 function instead
Motivation: At Thanos we would love to have better control over the subqueries step/interval.
This is important to choose proper resolution. I think having proper step also does not harm for
Prometheus and remote read users. Especially on stateless querier we do not know evaluation interval
and in fact putting global can be wrong to assume for Prometheus even.
I think ideally we could try to have at least 3 samples within the range, the same
way Prometheus UI and Grafana assumes.
Anyway this interfaces allows to decide on promQL user basis.
Open question: Is taking parent interval a smart move?
Motivation for removing global: I spent 1h fighting with:
=== RUN TestEvaluations
TestEvaluations: promql_test.go:31: unexpected error: error evaluating query "absent_over_time(rate(nonexistant[5m])[5m:])" (line 687): unexpected error: runtime error: integer divide by zero
--- FAIL: TestEvaluations (0.32s)
FAIL
At the end I found that this fails on most of the versions including this master if you run this test alone. If run together with many
other tests it passes. This is due to SetDefaultEvaluationInterval(1 * time.Minute)
in test that is ran before TestEvaluations. Thanks to globals (:
Let's fix it by dropping this global.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
* Added issue links for TODOs.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
* Removed irrelevant changes.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
