2017-04-10 11:59:45 -07:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2017 The Prometheus Authors
|
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
package index
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-09 01:41:51 -08:00
|
|
|
import (
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
"container/heap"
|
2023-09-13 08:45:06 -07:00
|
|
|
"context"
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
"encoding/binary"
|
2023-11-09 13:07:35 -08:00
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
"runtime"
|
2016-12-09 01:41:51 -08:00
|
|
|
"sort"
|
2023-09-21 13:53:51 -07:00
|
|
|
"strings"
|
2017-09-05 02:45:18 -07:00
|
|
|
"sync"
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-30 07:31:32 -07:00
|
|
|
"golang.org/x/exp/slices"
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-11-08 06:23:17 -08:00
|
|
|
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/model/labels"
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage"
|
2016-12-09 01:41:51 -08:00
|
|
|
)
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-22 00:43:34 -08:00
|
|
|
var allPostingsKey = labels.Label{}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// AllPostingsKey returns the label key that is used to store the postings list of all existing IDs.
|
|
|
|
func AllPostingsKey() (name, value string) {
|
|
|
|
return allPostingsKey.Name, allPostingsKey.Value
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
// ensureOrderBatchSize is the max number of postings passed to a worker in a single batch in MemPostings.EnsureOrder().
|
|
|
|
const ensureOrderBatchSize = 1024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ensureOrderBatchPool is a pool used to recycle batches passed to workers in MemPostings.EnsureOrder().
|
|
|
|
var ensureOrderBatchPool = sync.Pool{
|
|
|
|
New: func() interface{} {
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
x := make([][]storage.SeriesRef, 0, ensureOrderBatchSize)
|
|
|
|
return &x // Return pointer type as preferred by Pool.
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// MemPostings holds postings list for series ID per label pair. They may be written
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
// to out of order.
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
// EnsureOrder() must be called once before any reads are done. This allows for quick
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
// unordered batch fills on startup.
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
type MemPostings struct {
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
mtx sync.RWMutex
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
m map[string]map[string][]storage.SeriesRef
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
ordered bool
|
2016-12-10 00:44:00 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// NewMemPostings returns a memPostings that's ready for reads and writes.
|
|
|
|
func NewMemPostings() *MemPostings {
|
|
|
|
return &MemPostings{
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
m: make(map[string]map[string][]storage.SeriesRef, 512),
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
ordered: true,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// NewUnorderedMemPostings returns a memPostings that is not safe to be read from
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
// until EnsureOrder() was called once.
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
func NewUnorderedMemPostings() *MemPostings {
|
|
|
|
return &MemPostings{
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
m: make(map[string]map[string][]storage.SeriesRef, 512),
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
ordered: false,
|
2017-09-05 02:45:18 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-08 02:18:48 -07:00
|
|
|
// Symbols returns an iterator over all unique name and value strings, in order.
|
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) Symbols() StringIter {
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add all the strings to a map to de-duplicate.
|
|
|
|
symbols := make(map[string]struct{}, 512)
|
|
|
|
for n, e := range p.m {
|
|
|
|
symbols[n] = struct{}{}
|
|
|
|
for v := range e {
|
|
|
|
symbols[v] = struct{}{}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
res := make([]string, 0, len(symbols))
|
|
|
|
for k := range symbols {
|
|
|
|
res = append(res, k)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-30 07:33:56 -07:00
|
|
|
slices.Sort(res)
|
2021-09-08 02:18:48 -07:00
|
|
|
return NewStringListIter(res)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// SortedKeys returns a list of sorted label keys of the postings.
|
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) SortedKeys() []labels.Label {
|
2017-11-28 23:28:55 -08:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
|
|
|
keys := make([]labels.Label, 0, len(p.m))
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
for n, e := range p.m {
|
|
|
|
for v := range e {
|
|
|
|
keys = append(keys, labels.Label{Name: n, Value: v})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-28 23:28:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-21 13:53:51 -07:00
|
|
|
slices.SortFunc(keys, func(a, b labels.Label) int {
|
|
|
|
nameCompare := strings.Compare(a.Name, b.Name)
|
|
|
|
// If names are the same, compare values.
|
|
|
|
if nameCompare != 0 {
|
|
|
|
return nameCompare
|
2017-11-28 23:28:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2023-09-21 13:53:51 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return strings.Compare(a.Value, b.Value)
|
2017-11-28 23:28:55 -08:00
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
return keys
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-10 08:05:47 -07:00
|
|
|
// LabelNames returns all the unique label names.
|
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) LabelNames() []string {
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
|
|
|
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
n := len(p.m)
|
|
|
|
if n == 0 {
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
names := make([]string, 0, n-1)
|
|
|
|
for name := range p.m {
|
|
|
|
if name != allPostingsKey.Name {
|
|
|
|
names = append(names, name)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return names
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// LabelValues returns label values for the given name.
|
2023-09-14 07:02:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) LabelValues(_ context.Context, name string) []string {
|
2020-09-10 08:05:47 -07:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
|
|
|
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
values := make([]string, 0, len(p.m[name]))
|
|
|
|
for v := range p.m[name] {
|
|
|
|
values = append(values, v)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return values
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
// PostingsStats contains cardinality based statistics for postings.
|
|
|
|
type PostingsStats struct {
|
|
|
|
CardinalityMetricsStats []Stat
|
|
|
|
CardinalityLabelStats []Stat
|
|
|
|
LabelValueStats []Stat
|
|
|
|
LabelValuePairsStats []Stat
|
2021-01-06 22:41:32 -08:00
|
|
|
NumLabelPairs int
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Stats calculates the cardinality statistics from postings.
|
2023-05-22 05:37:07 -07:00
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) Stats(label string, limit int) *PostingsStats {
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
var size uint64
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
metrics := &maxHeap{}
|
|
|
|
labels := &maxHeap{}
|
2019-11-19 13:03:24 -08:00
|
|
|
labelValueLength := &maxHeap{}
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
labelValuePairs := &maxHeap{}
|
2021-01-06 22:41:32 -08:00
|
|
|
numLabelPairs := 0
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-22 05:37:07 -07:00
|
|
|
metrics.init(limit)
|
|
|
|
labels.init(limit)
|
|
|
|
labelValueLength.init(limit)
|
|
|
|
labelValuePairs.init(limit)
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for n, e := range p.m {
|
|
|
|
if n == "" {
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
labels.push(Stat{Name: n, Count: uint64(len(e))})
|
2021-01-06 22:41:32 -08:00
|
|
|
numLabelPairs += len(e)
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
size = 0
|
|
|
|
for name, values := range e {
|
|
|
|
if n == label {
|
|
|
|
metrics.push(Stat{Name: name, Count: uint64(len(values))})
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-05-19 00:36:30 -07:00
|
|
|
seriesCnt := uint64(len(values))
|
|
|
|
labelValuePairs.push(Stat{Name: n + "=" + name, Count: seriesCnt})
|
|
|
|
size += uint64(len(name)) * seriesCnt
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-11-19 13:03:24 -08:00
|
|
|
labelValueLength.push(Stat{Name: n, Count: size})
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return &PostingsStats{
|
|
|
|
CardinalityMetricsStats: metrics.get(),
|
|
|
|
CardinalityLabelStats: labels.get(),
|
2019-11-19 13:03:24 -08:00
|
|
|
LabelValueStats: labelValueLength.get(),
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
LabelValuePairsStats: labelValuePairs.get(),
|
2021-01-06 22:41:32 -08:00
|
|
|
NumLabelPairs: numLabelPairs,
|
2019-11-04 18:06:13 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// Get returns a postings list for the given label pair.
|
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) Get(name, value string) Postings {
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
var lp []storage.SeriesRef
|
2017-09-05 02:45:18 -07:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
l := p.m[name]
|
|
|
|
if l != nil {
|
|
|
|
lp = l[value]
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-05 02:45:18 -07:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
if lp == nil {
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
return EmptyPostings()
|
2016-12-31 01:19:02 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
return newListPostings(lp...)
|
2016-12-09 01:41:51 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// All returns a postings list over all documents ever added.
|
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) All() Postings {
|
2017-12-22 00:43:34 -08:00
|
|
|
return p.Get(AllPostingsKey())
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// EnsureOrder ensures that all postings lists are sorted. After it returns all further
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
// calls to add and addFor will insert new IDs in a sorted manner.
|
2023-04-18 03:13:05 -07:00
|
|
|
// Parameter numberOfConcurrentProcesses is used to specify the maximal number of
|
|
|
|
// CPU cores used for this operation. If it is <= 0, GOMAXPROCS is used.
|
|
|
|
// GOMAXPROCS was the default before introducing this parameter.
|
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) EnsureOrder(numberOfConcurrentProcesses int) {
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.Lock()
|
|
|
|
defer p.mtx.Unlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if p.ordered {
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 03:13:05 -07:00
|
|
|
concurrency := numberOfConcurrentProcesses
|
|
|
|
if concurrency <= 0 {
|
|
|
|
concurrency = runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
workc := make(chan *[][]storage.SeriesRef)
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var wg sync.WaitGroup
|
2023-04-18 03:13:05 -07:00
|
|
|
wg.Add(concurrency)
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-04-18 03:13:05 -07:00
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < concurrency; i++ {
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
go func() {
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
for job := range workc {
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
for _, l := range *job {
|
2022-09-30 07:31:32 -07:00
|
|
|
slices.Sort(l)
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
*job = (*job)[:0]
|
|
|
|
ensureOrderBatchPool.Put(job)
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
wg.Done()
|
|
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
nextJob := ensureOrderBatchPool.Get().(*[][]storage.SeriesRef)
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
for _, e := range p.m {
|
|
|
|
for _, l := range e {
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
*nextJob = append(*nextJob, l)
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
if len(*nextJob) >= ensureOrderBatchSize {
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
workc <- nextJob
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
nextJob = ensureOrderBatchPool.Get().(*[][]storage.SeriesRef)
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the last job was partially filled, we need to push it to workers too.
|
2022-03-30 02:40:19 -07:00
|
|
|
if len(*nextJob) > 0 {
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
workc <- nextJob
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
close(workc)
|
|
|
|
wg.Wait()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p.ordered = true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// Delete removes all ids in the given map from the postings lists.
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) Delete(deleted map[storage.SeriesRef]struct{}) {
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
var keys, vals []string
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-22 00:43:34 -08:00
|
|
|
// Collect all keys relevant for deletion once. New keys added afterwards
|
|
|
|
// can by definition not be affected by any of the given deletes.
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
for n := range p.m {
|
|
|
|
keys = append(keys, n)
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
for _, n := range keys {
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
|
|
|
vals = vals[:0]
|
|
|
|
for v := range p.m[n] {
|
|
|
|
vals = append(vals, v)
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// For each posting we first analyse whether the postings list is affected by the deletes.
|
|
|
|
// If yes, we actually reallocate a new postings list.
|
|
|
|
for _, l := range vals {
|
|
|
|
// Only lock for processing one postings list so we don't block reads for too long.
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.Lock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found := false
|
|
|
|
for _, id := range p.m[n][l] {
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := deleted[id]; ok {
|
|
|
|
found = true
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !found {
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.Unlock()
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
repl := make([]storage.SeriesRef, 0, len(p.m[n][l]))
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
for _, id := range p.m[n][l] {
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := deleted[id]; !ok {
|
|
|
|
repl = append(repl, id)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
if len(repl) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
p.m[n][l] = repl
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
delete(p.m[n], l)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.Unlock()
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.Lock()
|
|
|
|
if len(p.m[n]) == 0 {
|
|
|
|
delete(p.m, n)
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.Unlock()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Iter calls f for each postings list. It aborts if f returns an error and returns it.
|
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) Iter(f func(labels.Label, Postings) error) error {
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.RLock()
|
|
|
|
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
for n, e := range p.m {
|
|
|
|
for v, p := range e {
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
if err := f(labels.Label{Name: n, Value: v}, newListPostings(p...)); err != nil {
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add a label set to the postings index.
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) Add(id storage.SeriesRef, lset labels.Labels) {
|
2017-09-05 02:45:18 -07:00
|
|
|
p.mtx.Lock()
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-09 14:18:47 -08:00
|
|
|
lset.Range(func(l labels.Label) {
|
2017-09-20 09:08:57 -07:00
|
|
|
p.addFor(id, l)
|
2022-03-09 14:18:47 -08:00
|
|
|
})
|
2017-09-20 09:08:57 -07:00
|
|
|
p.addFor(id, allPostingsKey)
|
2017-09-05 02:45:18 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p.mtx.Unlock()
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (p *MemPostings) addFor(id storage.SeriesRef, l labels.Label) {
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
nm, ok := p.m[l.Name]
|
|
|
|
if !ok {
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
nm = map[string][]storage.SeriesRef{}
|
2018-11-02 07:27:19 -07:00
|
|
|
p.m[l.Name] = nm
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
list := append(nm[l.Value], id)
|
|
|
|
nm[l.Value] = list
|
2017-09-20 09:08:57 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-05 13:22:14 -07:00
|
|
|
if !p.ordered {
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-20 09:08:57 -07:00
|
|
|
// There is no guarantee that no higher ID was inserted before as they may
|
|
|
|
// be generated independently before adding them to postings.
|
|
|
|
// We repair order violations on insert. The invariant is that the first n-1
|
|
|
|
// items in the list are already sorted.
|
|
|
|
for i := len(list) - 1; i >= 1; i-- {
|
|
|
|
if list[i] >= list[i-1] {
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
list[i], list[i-1] = list[i-1], list[i]
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// ExpandPostings returns the postings expanded as a slice.
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func ExpandPostings(p Postings) (res []storage.SeriesRef, err error) {
|
2017-09-20 09:08:57 -07:00
|
|
|
for p.Next() {
|
|
|
|
res = append(res, p.At())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return res, p.Err()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
|
|
|
// Postings provides iterative access over a postings list.
|
|
|
|
type Postings interface {
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
// Next advances the iterator and returns true if another value was found.
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
Next() bool
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
// Seek advances the iterator to value v or greater and returns
|
|
|
|
// true if a value was found.
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
Seek(v storage.SeriesRef) bool
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-02 04:27:52 -08:00
|
|
|
// At returns the value at the current iterator position.
|
2023-10-09 07:15:06 -07:00
|
|
|
// At should only be called after a successful call to Next or Seek.
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
At() storage.SeriesRef
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Err returns the last error of the iterator.
|
|
|
|
Err() error
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
|
|
|
// errPostings is an empty iterator that always errors.
|
|
|
|
type errPostings struct {
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (e errPostings) Next() bool { return false }
|
|
|
|
func (e errPostings) Seek(storage.SeriesRef) bool { return false }
|
|
|
|
func (e errPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef { return 0 }
|
|
|
|
func (e errPostings) Err() error { return e.err }
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
var emptyPostings = errPostings{}
|
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-13 03:16:58 -08:00
|
|
|
// EmptyPostings returns a postings list that's always empty.
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
// NOTE: Returning EmptyPostings sentinel when Postings struct has no postings is recommended.
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
// It triggers optimized flow in other functions like Intersect, Without etc.
|
2017-11-13 03:16:58 -08:00
|
|
|
func EmptyPostings() Postings {
|
|
|
|
return emptyPostings
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-10 01:51:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// IsEmptyPostingsType returns true if the postings are an empty postings list.
|
|
|
|
// When this function returns false, it doesn't mean that the postings isn't empty
|
|
|
|
// (it could be an empty intersection of two non-empty postings, for example).
|
|
|
|
func IsEmptyPostingsType(p Postings) bool {
|
|
|
|
return p == emptyPostings
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// ErrPostings returns new postings that immediately error.
|
|
|
|
func ErrPostings(err error) Postings {
|
|
|
|
return errPostings{err}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
|
|
|
// Intersect returns a new postings list over the intersection of the
|
|
|
|
// input postings.
|
|
|
|
func Intersect(its ...Postings) Postings {
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
if len(its) == 0 {
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
return EmptyPostings()
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-06-12 23:25:13 -07:00
|
|
|
if len(its) == 1 {
|
|
|
|
return its[0]
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
for _, p := range its {
|
|
|
|
if p == EmptyPostings() {
|
|
|
|
return EmptyPostings()
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return newIntersectPostings(its...)
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
|
|
|
type intersectPostings struct {
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
arr []Postings
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
cur storage.SeriesRef
|
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
func newIntersectPostings(its ...Postings) *intersectPostings {
|
|
|
|
return &intersectPostings{arr: its}
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *intersectPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
|
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
|
|
|
return it.cur
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *intersectPostings) doNext() bool {
|
|
|
|
Loop:
|
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
|
|
|
for {
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
for _, p := range it.arr {
|
|
|
|
if !p.Seek(it.cur) {
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
if p.At() > it.cur {
|
|
|
|
it.cur = p.At()
|
|
|
|
continue Loop
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (it *intersectPostings) Next() bool {
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
for _, p := range it.arr {
|
|
|
|
if !p.Next() {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if p.At() > it.cur {
|
|
|
|
it.cur = p.At()
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
return it.doNext()
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *intersectPostings) Seek(id storage.SeriesRef) bool {
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
it.cur = id
|
|
|
|
return it.doNext()
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
|
|
|
func (it *intersectPostings) Err() error {
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
for _, p := range it.arr {
|
|
|
|
if p.Err() != nil {
|
|
|
|
return p.Err()
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-06-11 01:14:25 -07:00
|
|
|
return nil
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
// Merge returns a new iterator over the union of the input iterators.
|
2023-09-13 08:45:06 -07:00
|
|
|
func Merge(ctx context.Context, its ...Postings) Postings {
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
if len(its) == 0 {
|
2017-12-17 10:08:21 -08:00
|
|
|
return EmptyPostings()
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-06-12 23:25:13 -07:00
|
|
|
if len(its) == 1 {
|
|
|
|
return its[0]
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2023-09-13 08:45:06 -07:00
|
|
|
p, ok := newMergedPostings(ctx, its)
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
|
|
return EmptyPostings()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return p
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type postingsHeap []Postings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (h postingsHeap) Len() int { return len(h) }
|
|
|
|
func (h postingsHeap) Less(i, j int) bool { return h[i].At() < h[j].At() }
|
|
|
|
func (h *postingsHeap) Swap(i, j int) { (*h)[i], (*h)[j] = (*h)[j], (*h)[i] }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (h *postingsHeap) Push(x interface{}) {
|
|
|
|
*h = append(*h, x.(Postings))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (h *postingsHeap) Pop() interface{} {
|
|
|
|
old := *h
|
|
|
|
n := len(old)
|
|
|
|
x := old[n-1]
|
|
|
|
*h = old[0 : n-1]
|
|
|
|
return x
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type mergedPostings struct {
|
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
|
|
|
h postingsHeap
|
|
|
|
initialized bool
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
cur storage.SeriesRef
|
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
|
|
|
err error
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-13 08:45:06 -07:00
|
|
|
func newMergedPostings(ctx context.Context, p []Postings) (m *mergedPostings, nonEmpty bool) {
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
ph := make(postingsHeap, 0, len(p))
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
for _, it := range p {
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
// NOTE: mergedPostings struct requires the user to issue an initial Next.
|
style: Replace `else if` cascades with `switch`
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2023-04-12 07:14:31 -07:00
|
|
|
switch {
|
2023-09-13 08:45:06 -07:00
|
|
|
case ctx.Err() != nil:
|
|
|
|
return &mergedPostings{err: ctx.Err()}, true
|
style: Replace `else if` cascades with `switch`
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2023-04-12 07:14:31 -07:00
|
|
|
case it.Next():
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
ph = append(ph, it)
|
style: Replace `else if` cascades with `switch`
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2023-04-12 07:14:31 -07:00
|
|
|
case it.Err() != nil:
|
2023-04-09 00:08:40 -07:00
|
|
|
return &mergedPostings{err: it.Err()}, true
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(ph) == 0 {
|
|
|
|
return nil, false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return &mergedPostings{h: ph}, true
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (it *mergedPostings) Next() bool {
|
|
|
|
if it.h.Len() == 0 || it.err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The user must issue an initial Next.
|
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
|
|
|
if !it.initialized {
|
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595)
The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's
many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting
lists.
Adjust benchmark to catch this.
Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore.
Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7):
```
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99%
```
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
|
|
|
heap.Init(&it.h)
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
it.cur = it.h[0].At()
|
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
|
|
|
it.initialized = true
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
cur := it.h[0]
|
|
|
|
if !cur.Next() {
|
|
|
|
heap.Pop(&it.h)
|
|
|
|
if cur.Err() != nil {
|
|
|
|
it.err = cur.Err()
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if it.h.Len() == 0 {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// Value of top of heap has changed, re-heapify.
|
|
|
|
heap.Fix(&it.h, 0)
|
2019-01-03 08:59:52 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if it.h[0].At() != it.cur {
|
|
|
|
it.cur = it.h[0].At()
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *mergedPostings) Seek(id storage.SeriesRef) bool {
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
if it.h.Len() == 0 || it.err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-01-02 06:54:09 -08:00
|
|
|
if !it.initialized {
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
if !it.Next() {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
2019-01-03 08:59:52 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
Fix missing postings in Merge and Intersect (#77)
* Test for a previous implematation of Intersect
Before we were moving the postings list everytime we create a new
chained `intersectPostings`. That was causing some postings to be
skipped. This test fails on the older version.
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
* Advance on Seek only when valid.
Issue:
Before in mergedPostings and others we advance everytime we `Seek`,
which causes issues with `Intersect`.
Take the case, where we have a mergedPostings = m merging, a: {10, 20, 30} and
b: {15, 25, 35}. Everytime we `Seek`, we do a.Seek and b.Seek.
Now if we Intersect m with {21, 22, 23, 30}, we would do Seek({21,22,23}) which
would advance a and b beyond 30.
Fix:
Now we advance only when the seeking value is greater than the current
value, as the definition specifies.
Also, posting 0 will not be a valid posting and will be used to signal
finished or un-initialized PostingsList.
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
* Add test for Merge+Intersect edgecase.
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
* Add comments to trivial tests.
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
2017-05-12 00:44:41 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595)
The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's
many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting
lists.
Adjust benchmark to catch this.
Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore.
Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7):
```
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99%
```
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
|
|
|
for it.cur < id {
|
|
|
|
cur := it.h[0]
|
|
|
|
if !cur.Seek(id) {
|
|
|
|
heap.Pop(&it.h)
|
|
|
|
if cur.Err() != nil {
|
|
|
|
it.err = cur.Err()
|
|
|
|
return false
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595)
The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's
many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting
lists.
Adjust benchmark to catch this.
Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore.
Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7):
```
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99%
```
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
|
|
|
if it.h.Len() == 0 {
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595)
The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's
many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting
lists.
Adjust benchmark to catch this.
Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore.
Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7):
```
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99%
```
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// Value of top of heap has changed, re-heapify.
|
|
|
|
heap.Fix(&it.h, 0)
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
Simplify mergedPostings.Seek (#595)
The current implementation leads to very slow behaviour when there's
many lists, this no worse than n log k, where k is the number of posting
lists.
Adjust benchmark to catch this.
Remove flattening of without lists, not needed anymore.
Benchmark versus 0.4.0 (used in Prometheus 2.7):
```
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 189907976 188863880 -0.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 113950106 110791414 -2.77%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 104965646 102388760 -2.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 138743592 104424250 -24.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 5279594954 5206096267 -1.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 8004610589 6184527719 -22.74%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 2476042646 1003920432 -59.45%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 7178244655 6059725323 -15.58%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 199342649 166642946 -16.40%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 215774683 167515095 -22.37%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 2214714769 392943663 -82.26%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 2148727410 322289262 -85.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 2170658009 338458171 -84.41%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 235720135 70597905 -70.05%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 2190570590 343034307 -84.34%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 2373784439 387297908 -83.68%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 33 33 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 41 39 -4.88%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 56 56 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 251577 100115 -60.21%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 251123 100077 -60.15%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 251525 100112 -60.20%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 42 39 -7.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 52 42 -19.23%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 251069 100101 -60.13%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 251473 100101 -60.19%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 250914 100102 -60.11%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 30038 11181 -62.78%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 250813 100105 -60.09%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 281503 111260 -60.48%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-8 10887600 10887600 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-8 5456416 5456416 +0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-8 5456640 5456544 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-8 258254504 258254472 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-8 520126192 281554792 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-8 263446640 24908456 -90.55%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-8 520121144 281553664 -45.87%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-8 7062448 7062272 -0.00%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-8 7063473 7062384 -0.02%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!=""-8 274325656 35793776 -86.95%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-8 268926824 30362624 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-8 268882992 30363000 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-8 33193401 4269304 -87.14%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-8 268875024 30363096 -88.71%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-8 300589656 33099784 -88.99%
```
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-05-13 02:51:07 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it.cur = it.h[0].At()
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it mergedPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
|
2019-02-28 09:23:55 -08:00
|
|
|
return it.cur
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (it mergedPostings) Err() error {
|
|
|
|
return it.err
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
// Without returns a new postings list that contains all elements from the full list that
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
// are not in the drop list.
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
func Without(full, drop Postings) Postings {
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
if full == EmptyPostings() {
|
|
|
|
return EmptyPostings()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if drop == EmptyPostings() {
|
|
|
|
return full
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
return newRemovedPostings(full, drop)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-17 10:08:21 -08:00
|
|
|
type removedPostings struct {
|
|
|
|
full, remove Postings
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
cur storage.SeriesRef
|
2017-12-17 10:08:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
initialized bool
|
|
|
|
fok, rok bool
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func newRemovedPostings(full, remove Postings) *removedPostings {
|
|
|
|
return &removedPostings{
|
|
|
|
full: full,
|
|
|
|
remove: remove,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (rp *removedPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
|
2017-12-17 10:08:21 -08:00
|
|
|
return rp.cur
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (rp *removedPostings) Next() bool {
|
|
|
|
if !rp.initialized {
|
|
|
|
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
|
|
|
|
rp.rok = rp.remove.Next()
|
|
|
|
rp.initialized = true
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-02-14 05:43:04 -08:00
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
if !rp.fok {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-17 10:08:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 05:43:04 -08:00
|
|
|
if !rp.rok {
|
|
|
|
rp.cur = rp.full.At()
|
|
|
|
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
style: Replace `else if` cascades with `switch`
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2023-04-12 07:14:31 -07:00
|
|
|
switch fcur, rcur := rp.full.At(), rp.remove.At(); {
|
2023-04-09 00:08:40 -07:00
|
|
|
case fcur < rcur:
|
2018-02-14 05:43:04 -08:00
|
|
|
rp.cur = fcur
|
|
|
|
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
|
2017-12-17 10:08:21 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 05:43:04 -08:00
|
|
|
return true
|
2023-04-09 00:08:40 -07:00
|
|
|
case rcur < fcur:
|
2018-02-14 05:43:04 -08:00
|
|
|
// Forward the remove postings to the right position.
|
|
|
|
rp.rok = rp.remove.Seek(fcur)
|
2023-04-09 00:08:40 -07:00
|
|
|
default:
|
2018-02-14 05:43:04 -08:00
|
|
|
// Skip the current posting.
|
|
|
|
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-17 10:08:21 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (rp *removedPostings) Seek(id storage.SeriesRef) bool {
|
2017-12-17 10:08:21 -08:00
|
|
|
if rp.cur >= id {
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rp.fok = rp.full.Seek(id)
|
|
|
|
rp.rok = rp.remove.Seek(id)
|
|
|
|
rp.initialized = true
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return rp.Next()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (rp *removedPostings) Err() error {
|
|
|
|
if rp.full.Err() != nil {
|
|
|
|
return rp.full.Err()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return rp.remove.Err()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572)
* Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher.
* Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference.
* Be smarter in how we look at matchers.
Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty.
Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup
rather than an inverse postings list.
All all the Withouts together, rather than
having to subtract each from all postings.
Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a
Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list.
The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern
i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01%
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
|
|
|
// ListPostings implements the Postings interface over a plain list.
|
|
|
|
type ListPostings struct {
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
list []storage.SeriesRef
|
2023-10-09 08:25:18 -07:00
|
|
|
cur storage.SeriesRef
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func NewListPostings(list []storage.SeriesRef) Postings {
|
2019-03-21 09:23:00 -07:00
|
|
|
return newListPostings(list...)
|
2017-11-30 06:34:49 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func newListPostings(list ...storage.SeriesRef) *ListPostings {
|
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572)
* Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher.
* Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference.
* Be smarter in how we look at matchers.
Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty.
Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup
rather than an inverse postings list.
All all the Withouts together, rather than
having to subtract each from all postings.
Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a
Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list.
The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern
i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01%
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
|
|
|
return &ListPostings{list: list}
|
2016-12-27 23:50:20 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *ListPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
|
2023-10-09 08:25:18 -07:00
|
|
|
return it.cur
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572)
* Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher.
* Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference.
* Be smarter in how we look at matchers.
Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty.
Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup
rather than an inverse postings list.
All all the Withouts together, rather than
having to subtract each from all postings.
Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a
Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list.
The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern
i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01%
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *ListPostings) Next() bool {
|
2023-10-09 08:25:18 -07:00
|
|
|
if len(it.list) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
it.cur = it.list[0]
|
|
|
|
it.list = it.list[1:]
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-10-09 08:25:18 -07:00
|
|
|
it.cur = 0
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
return false
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *ListPostings) Seek(x storage.SeriesRef) bool {
|
2023-10-02 07:24:25 -07:00
|
|
|
// If the current value satisfies, then return.
|
2023-10-09 08:25:18 -07:00
|
|
|
if it.cur >= x {
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-10-09 08:25:18 -07:00
|
|
|
if len(it.list) == 0 {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-10-02 07:24:25 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Do binary search between current position and end.
|
2023-10-09 08:25:18 -07:00
|
|
|
i := sort.Search(len(it.list), func(i int) bool {
|
|
|
|
return it.list[i] >= x
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
if i < len(it.list) {
|
|
|
|
it.cur = it.list[i]
|
|
|
|
it.list = it.list[i+1:]
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it.list = nil
|
|
|
|
return false
|
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-09 01:41:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572)
* Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher.
* Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference.
* Be smarter in how we look at matchers.
Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty.
Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup
rather than an inverse postings list.
All all the Withouts together, rather than
having to subtract each from all postings.
Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a
Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list.
The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern
i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93%
BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01%
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *ListPostings) Err() error {
|
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-27 01:34:42 -07:00
|
|
|
// bigEndianPostings implements the Postings interface over a byte stream of
|
|
|
|
// big endian numbers.
|
|
|
|
type bigEndianPostings struct {
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
list []byte
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
cur uint32
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-27 01:34:42 -07:00
|
|
|
func newBigEndianPostings(list []byte) *bigEndianPostings {
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
return &bigEndianPostings{list: list}
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *bigEndianPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
|
|
|
|
return storage.SeriesRef(it.cur)
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-27 01:34:42 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Next() bool {
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
if len(it.list) >= 4 {
|
|
|
|
it.cur = binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list)
|
|
|
|
it.list = it.list[4:]
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-11-06 03:10:04 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Seek(x storage.SeriesRef) bool {
|
|
|
|
if storage.SeriesRef(it.cur) >= x {
|
Fix missing postings in Merge and Intersect (#77)
* Test for a previous implematation of Intersect
Before we were moving the postings list everytime we create a new
chained `intersectPostings`. That was causing some postings to be
skipped. This test fails on the older version.
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
* Advance on Seek only when valid.
Issue:
Before in mergedPostings and others we advance everytime we `Seek`,
which causes issues with `Intersect`.
Take the case, where we have a mergedPostings = m merging, a: {10, 20, 30} and
b: {15, 25, 35}. Everytime we `Seek`, we do a.Seek and b.Seek.
Now if we Intersect m with {21, 22, 23, 30}, we would do Seek({21,22,23}) which
would advance a and b beyond 30.
Fix:
Now we advance only when the seeking value is greater than the current
value, as the definition specifies.
Also, posting 0 will not be a valid posting and will be used to signal
finished or un-initialized PostingsList.
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
* Add test for Merge+Intersect edgecase.
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
* Add comments to trivial tests.
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
2017-05-12 00:44:41 -07:00
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
num := len(it.list) / 4
|
|
|
|
// Do binary search between current position and end.
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
i := sort.Search(num, func(i int) bool {
|
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
|
|
|
return binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list[i*4:]) >= uint32(x)
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
})
|
2017-04-23 16:53:56 -07:00
|
|
|
if i < num {
|
|
|
|
j := i * 4
|
|
|
|
it.cur = binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list[j:])
|
|
|
|
it.list = it.list[j+4:]
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it.list = nil
|
|
|
|
return false
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-27 01:34:42 -07:00
|
|
|
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Err() error {
|
2017-03-26 11:10:12 -07:00
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-11-05 03:01:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
// FindIntersectingPostings checks the intersection of p and candidates[i] for each i in candidates,
|
|
|
|
// if intersection is non empty, then i is added to the indexes returned.
|
|
|
|
// Returned indexes are not sorted.
|
|
|
|
func FindIntersectingPostings(p Postings, candidates []Postings) (indexes []int, err error) {
|
|
|
|
h := make(postingsWithIndexHeap, 0, len(candidates))
|
|
|
|
for idx, it := range candidates {
|
style: Replace `else if` cascades with `switch`
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2023-04-12 07:14:31 -07:00
|
|
|
switch {
|
|
|
|
case it.Next():
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
h = append(h, postingsWithIndex{index: idx, p: it})
|
style: Replace `else if` cascades with `switch`
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2023-04-12 07:14:31 -07:00
|
|
|
case it.Err() != nil:
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
return nil, it.Err()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
if h.empty() {
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
return nil, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
heap.Init(&h)
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
for !h.empty() {
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if !p.Seek(h.at()) {
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
return indexes, p.Err()
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
if p.At() == h.at() {
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
indexes = append(indexes, h.popIndex())
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
} else if err := h.next(); err != nil {
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
return nil, err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return indexes, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// postingsWithIndex is used as postingsWithIndexHeap elements by FindIntersectingPostings,
|
|
|
|
// keeping track of the original index of each postings while they move inside the heap.
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
type postingsWithIndex struct {
|
|
|
|
index int
|
|
|
|
p Postings
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// popped means that these postings shouldn't be considered anymore.
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
// See popIndex() comment to understand why we need this.
|
|
|
|
popped bool
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// postingsWithIndexHeap implements heap.Interface,
|
|
|
|
// with root always pointing to the postings with minimum Postings.At() value.
|
|
|
|
// It also implements a special way of removing elements that marks them as popped and moves them to the bottom of the
|
|
|
|
// heap instead of actually removing them, see popIndex() for more details.
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
type postingsWithIndexHeap []postingsWithIndex
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
// empty checks whether the heap is empty, which is true if it has no elements, of if the smallest element is popped.
|
|
|
|
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) empty() bool {
|
|
|
|
return len(*h) == 0 || (*h)[0].popped
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// popIndex pops the smallest heap element and returns its index.
|
|
|
|
// In our implementation we don't actually do heap.Pop(), instead we mark the element as `popped` and fix its position, which
|
|
|
|
// should be after all the non-popped elements according to our sorting strategy.
|
|
|
|
// By skipping the `heap.Pop()` call we avoid an extra allocation in this heap's Pop() implementation which returns an interface{}.
|
|
|
|
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) popIndex() int {
|
|
|
|
index := (*h)[0].index
|
|
|
|
(*h)[0].popped = true
|
|
|
|
heap.Fix(h, 0)
|
|
|
|
return index
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// at provides the storage.SeriesRef where root Postings is pointing at this moment.
|
|
|
|
func (h postingsWithIndexHeap) at() storage.SeriesRef { return h[0].p.At() }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// next performs the Postings.Next() operation on the root of the heap, performing the related operation on the heap
|
|
|
|
// and conveniently returning the result of calling Postings.Err() if the result of calling Next() was false.
|
|
|
|
// If Next() succeeds, heap is fixed to move the root to its new position, according to its Postings.At() value.
|
|
|
|
// If Next() returns fails and there's no error reported by Postings.Err(), then root is marked as removed and heap is fixed.
|
|
|
|
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) next() error {
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
pi := (*h)[0]
|
|
|
|
next := pi.p.Next()
|
|
|
|
if next {
|
|
|
|
heap.Fix(h, 0)
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err := pi.p.Err(); err != nil {
|
2023-11-09 13:07:35 -08:00
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("postings %d: %w", pi.index, err)
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
h.popIndex()
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// Len implements heap.Interface.
|
|
|
|
// Notice that Len() > 0 does not imply that heap is not empty as elements are not removed from this heap.
|
|
|
|
// Use empty() to check whether heap is empty or not.
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
func (h postingsWithIndexHeap) Len() int { return len(h) }
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Less implements heap.Interface, it puts all the popped elements at the bottom,
|
|
|
|
// and then sorts by Postings.At() property of each node.
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
func (h postingsWithIndexHeap) Less(i, j int) bool {
|
|
|
|
if h[i].popped != h[j].popped {
|
|
|
|
return h[j].popped
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return h[i].p.At() < h[j].p.At()
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Swap implements heap.Interface.
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) Swap(i, j int) { (*h)[i], (*h)[j] = (*h)[j], (*h)[i] }
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-06 02:33:44 -08:00
|
|
|
// Push implements heap.Interface.
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) Push(x interface{}) {
|
|
|
|
*h = append(*h, x.(postingsWithIndex))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Pop implements heap.Interface and pops the last element, which is NOT the min element,
|
|
|
|
// so this doesn't return the same heap.Pop()
|
2022-01-05 02:46:43 -08:00
|
|
|
// Although this method is implemented for correctness, we don't expect it to be used, see popIndex() method for details.
|
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907)
* LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings
Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this
checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series
(postings).
Pending to be benchmarked.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers
name old time/op new time/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0%
name old alloc/op new alloc/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0%
name old allocs/op new allocs/op
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Don't expand postings to intersect them
Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with
each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings
(and thus having all of them in memory at any point).
Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but
definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows.
Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were
reaching 1s.
Benchmark results:
name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0%
name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0%
name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0%
Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0%
Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0%
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Apply comment suggestions from the code review
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
* Change else { if } to else if
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
* Remove sorting of label values
We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
|
|
|
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) Pop() interface{} {
|
|
|
|
old := *h
|
|
|
|
n := len(old)
|
|
|
|
x := old[n-1]
|
|
|
|
*h = old[0 : n-1]
|
|
|
|
return x
|
|
|
|
}
|