Commit graph

25 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tobias Schmidt 434f0374f7 Refactor remote storage querier handling
* Decouple remote client from ReadRecent feature.
* Separate remote read filter into a small, testable function.
* Use storage.Queryable interface to compose independent
  functionalities.
2017-11-13 23:19:15 +01:00
Krasi Georgiev 5d8f93a22a now using only github.com/gogo/protobuf
bumped all grpc-gateway packages to v1.2.2
updated and run  the denproto.sh script
2017-11-02 11:31:57 +00:00
Tom Wilkie 9c3c98e8de Revert "Port 'Don't disable HTTP keep-alives for remote storage connections.' to 2.0 (see #3173)"
This reverts commit 0997191b18.
2017-10-26 13:43:48 +01:00
Tom Wilkie ee011d906d Port remote read server to 2.0. 2017-10-26 11:09:14 +01:00
Bryan Boreham 0997191b18 Port 'Don't disable HTTP keep-alives for remote storage connections.' to 2.0 (see #3173)
Removes configurability introduced in #3160 in favour of hard-coding,
per advice from @brian-brazil.
2017-10-26 11:08:33 +01:00
Tom Wilkie 3760f56c0c remote: Expose ClientConfig type (see #3165) 2017-10-26 11:08:33 +01:00
Tom Wilkie 16f71a7723 Port codec.go over form 1.8 branch. 2017-10-26 11:08:33 +01:00
Julius Volz 099df0c5f0 Migrate "golang.org/x/net/context" -> "context" (#3333)
In some places, where ctxhttp or gRPC are concerned, we still need to use the
old contexts.
2017-10-24 21:21:42 -07:00
Thibault Chataigner bf4a279a91 Remote storage reads based on oldest timestamp in primary storage (#3129)
Currently all read queries are simply pushed to remote read clients.
This is fine, except for remote storage for wich it unefficient and
make query slower even if remote read is unnecessary.
So we need instead to compare the oldest timestamp in primary/local
storage with the query range lower boundary. If the oldest timestamp
is older than the mint parameter, then there is no need for remote read.
This is an optionnal behavior per remote read client.

Signed-off-by: Thibault Chataigner <t.chataigner@criteo.com>
2017-10-18 12:08:14 +01:00
Marc Sluiter 6a633eece1 Added go-conntrack for monitoring http connections (#3241)
Added metrics for in- and outgoing traffic with go-conntrack.
2017-10-06 11:22:19 +01:00
Tom Wilkie b568ace7ce Move protos to ./prompb 2017-07-12 22:06:35 +01:00
Tom Wilkie 2dda5775e3 Initial port of remote storage to v2. 2017-07-12 12:27:57 +01:00
Fabian Reinartz 8ffc851147 Merge branch 'master' into dev-2.0 2017-04-04 15:17:56 +02:00
Julius Volz 3f23aa2cc7 Add headers to indicate remote read/write version
Also add Content-Type header.
2017-03-24 17:39:51 +01:00
Julius Volz 9b33cfc457 Fix/unify context-based remote storage timeouts 2017-03-20 14:17:06 +01:00
Julius Volz 815762a4ad Move retrieval.NewHTTPClient -> httputil.NewClientFromConfig 2017-03-20 14:17:04 +01:00
Julius Volz eb14678a25 Make remote read/write use config.HTTPClientConfig 2017-03-20 13:37:50 +01:00
Julius Volz 02395a224d [WIP] Remote Read 2017-03-20 13:13:44 +01:00
Julius Volz e9476b35d5 Re-add multiple remote writers
Each remote write endpoint gets its own set of relabeling rules.

This is based on the (yet-to-be-merged)
https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/2419, which removes legacy
remote write implementations.
2017-02-20 13:23:12 +01:00
Brian Brazil 77605649a9 Add support for remote write relabelling.
Switch back to a single remote writer, as we were only ever meant to
have one and the relabel semantics are clearer that way.
2016-10-05 07:43:19 +01:00
Tom Wilkie 4520e12440 Add HTTP Basic Auth & TLS support to the generic write path. (#1957)
* Add config, HTTP Basic Auth and TLS support to the generic write path.

- Move generic write path configuration to the config file
- Factor out config.TLSConfig -> tlf.Config translation
- Support TLSConfig for generic remote storage
- Rename Run to Start, and make it non-blocking.
- Dedupe code in httputil for TLS config.
- Make remote queue metrics global.
2016-09-19 22:47:51 +02:00
Tom Wilkie d83879210c Switch back to protos over HTTP, instead of GRPC.
My aim is to support the new grpc generic write path in Frankenstein.  On the surface this seems easy - however I've hit a number of problems that make me think it might be better to not use grpc just yet.

The explanation of the problems requires a little background.  At weave, traffic to frankenstein need to go through a couple of services first, for SSL and to be authenticated.  So traffic goes:

    internet -> frontend -> authfe -> frankenstein

- The frontend is Nginx, and adds/removes SSL.  Its done this way for legacy reasons, so the certs can be managed in one place, although eventually we imagine we'll merge it with authfe.  All traffic from frontend is sent to authfe.
- Authfe checks the auth tokens / cookie etc and then picks the service to forward the RPC to.
- Frankenstein accepts the reads and does the right thing with them.

First problem I hit was Nginx won't proxy http2 requests - it can accept them, but all calls downstream are http1 (see https://trac.nginx.org/nginx/ticket/923).  This wasn't such a big deal, so it now looks like:

    internet --(grpc/http2)--> frontend --(grpc/http1)--> authfe --(grpc/http1)--> frankenstein

Next problem was golang grpc server won't accept http1 requests (see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/grpc-io/JnjCYGPMUms).  It is possible to link a grpc server in with a normal go http mux, as long as the mux server is serving over SSL, as the golang http client & server won't do http2 over anything other than an SSL connection.  This would require making all our service to service comms SSL.  So I had a go a writing a grpc http1 server, and got pretty far.  But is was a bit of a mess.

So finally I thought I'd make a separate grpc frontend for this, running in parallel with the frontend/authfe combo on a different port - and first up I'd need a grpc reverse proxy.  Ideally we'd have some nice, generic reverse proxy that only knew about a map from service names -> downstream service, and didn't need to decode & re-encode every request as it went through.  It seems like this can't be done with golang's grpc library - see https://github.com/mwitkow/grpc-proxy/issues/1.

And then I was surprised to find you can't do grpc from browsers! See http://www.grpc.io/faq/ - not important to us, but I'm starting to question why we decided to use grpc in the first place?

It would seem we could have most of the benefits of grpc with protos over HTTP, and this wouldn't preclude moving to grpc when its a bit more mature?  In fact, the grcp FAQ even admits as much:

> Why is gRPC better than any binary blob over HTTP/2?
> This is largely what gRPC is on the wire.
2016-09-15 23:21:54 +01:00
Tobias Schmidt 29ced0090f Fix common english misspellings 2016-09-14 23:23:28 -04:00
Tobias Schmidt 8f3b62bfe4 Simplify struct initialization 2016-09-14 23:13:27 -04:00
Julius Volz aa3f2b7216 Generic write cleanups and changes.
- fold metric name into labels
- return initialization errors back to main
- add snappy compression
- better context handling
- pre-allocation of labels
- remove generic naming
- other cleanups
2016-08-30 17:24:48 +02:00