promql: Extend testing framework to support native histograms
This includes both the internal testing framework as well as the rules unit test feature of promtool.
This also adds a bunch of basic tests. Many of the code level tests can now be converted to tests within the framework, and more tests can be added easily.
---------
Signed-off-by: Harold Dost <h.dost@criteo.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregor Zeitlinger <gregor.zeitlinger@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Lang <stephen.lang@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Harold Dost <h.dost@criteo.com>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Lang <stephen.lang@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Gregor Zeitlinger <gregor.zeitlinger@grafana.com>
PR #12557 introduced the possibility of parsing multiple exemplars per
native histograms. It did so by requiring the `Exemplar` method of the
parser to be called repeatedly until it returns false. However, the
protobuf parser code wasn't correctly updated for the old case of a
single exemplar for a classic bucket (if actually parsed as a classic
bucket) and a single exemplar on a counter. In those cases, the method
would return `true` forever, yielding the same exemplar again and
again, leading to an endless loop.
With this fix, the state is now tracked and the single exemplar is
only returned once.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
Native histograms without observations and with a zero threshold of
zero look the same as classic histograms in the protobuf exposition
format. According to
https://github.com/prometheus/client_golang/issues/1127 , the idea is
to add a no-op span to those histograms to mark them as native
histograms. This commit enables Prometheus to detect that no-op span
and adds a doc comment to the proto spec describing the behavior.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
The bounds weren't really used so far, so no actual bug in the code so
far. But it's obviously confusing if the bounds returned by a
floatBucketIterator with a target schema different from the original
schema are wrong.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
If a float histogram has a zero bucket with a threshold of zero _and_
an empty zero bucket, it wasn't identified as a native histogram
because the `isNativeHistogram` helper function only looked at integer
buckets.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
Native histograms without a zero threshold aren't federated properly.
This adds a test to prove the specific failure mode, which is that
histograms with a zero threshold of zero are federated as classic
histograms.
The underlying reason is that the protobuf parser identifies a native
histogram by detecting a zero bucket or by detecting integer buckets.
Therefore, a float histogram with a zero threshold of zero and an
unpopulated zero bucket falls through the cracks (no integer buckets,
no zero bucket).
This commit also addse a test case for the latter.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
This has become a requirement for native histograms, as a single
histogram sample commonly has many buckets, so that providing many
exemplars makes sense.
Since OM text doesn't support native histograms yet, the test had to
be expanded to also support protobuf test cases.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
The problem was the following:
When trying to parse native histograms and classic histograms in
parallel, the parser would first parse the histogram proto messages as
a native histogram and then parse the same message again, but now as a
classic histogram. Afterwards, it would forget that it was dealing
with a metric family that contains native histograms and would parse
the rest of the metric family as classic histograms only. The fix is
to check again after being done with a classic histogram.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
