prometheus/tsdb/index/postings.go

940 lines
23 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

2017-04-10 11:59:45 -07:00
// Copyright 2017 The Prometheus Authors
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package index
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
import (
"container/heap"
"context"
"encoding/binary"
"fmt"
"math"
"runtime"
"slices"
"sort"
2023-09-21 13:53:51 -07:00
"strings"
"sync"
"github.com/bboreham/go-loser"
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/model/labels"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage"
)
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
var allPostingsKey = labels.Label{}
// AllPostingsKey returns the label key that is used to store the postings list of all existing IDs.
func AllPostingsKey() (name, value string) {
return allPostingsKey.Name, allPostingsKey.Value
}
// ensureOrderBatchSize is the max number of postings passed to a worker in a single batch in MemPostings.EnsureOrder().
const ensureOrderBatchSize = 1024
// ensureOrderBatchPool is a pool used to recycle batches passed to workers in MemPostings.EnsureOrder().
var ensureOrderBatchPool = sync.Pool{
New: func() interface{} {
x := make([][]storage.SeriesRef, 0, ensureOrderBatchSize)
return &x // Return pointer type as preferred by Pool.
},
}
// MemPostings holds postings list for series ID per label pair. They may be written
// to out of order.
// EnsureOrder() must be called once before any reads are done. This allows for quick
// unordered batch fills on startup.
type MemPostings struct {
mtx sync.RWMutex
m map[string]map[string][]storage.SeriesRef
ordered bool
2016-12-10 00:44:00 -08:00
}
// NewMemPostings returns a memPostings that's ready for reads and writes.
func NewMemPostings() *MemPostings {
return &MemPostings{
m: make(map[string]map[string][]storage.SeriesRef, 512),
ordered: true,
}
}
// NewUnorderedMemPostings returns a memPostings that is not safe to be read from
// until EnsureOrder() was called once.
func NewUnorderedMemPostings() *MemPostings {
return &MemPostings{
m: make(map[string]map[string][]storage.SeriesRef, 512),
ordered: false,
}
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
// Symbols returns an iterator over all unique name and value strings, in order.
func (p *MemPostings) Symbols() StringIter {
p.mtx.RLock()
// Add all the strings to a map to de-duplicate.
symbols := make(map[string]struct{}, 512)
for n, e := range p.m {
symbols[n] = struct{}{}
for v := range e {
symbols[v] = struct{}{}
}
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
res := make([]string, 0, len(symbols))
for k := range symbols {
res = append(res, k)
}
slices.Sort(res)
return NewStringListIter(res)
}
// SortedKeys returns a list of sorted label keys of the postings.
func (p *MemPostings) SortedKeys() []labels.Label {
p.mtx.RLock()
keys := make([]labels.Label, 0, len(p.m))
for n, e := range p.m {
for v := range e {
keys = append(keys, labels.Label{Name: n, Value: v})
}
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
2023-09-21 13:53:51 -07:00
slices.SortFunc(keys, func(a, b labels.Label) int {
nameCompare := strings.Compare(a.Name, b.Name)
// If names are the same, compare values.
if nameCompare != 0 {
return nameCompare
}
2023-09-21 13:53:51 -07:00
return strings.Compare(a.Value, b.Value)
})
return keys
}
// LabelNames returns all the unique label names.
func (p *MemPostings) LabelNames() []string {
p.mtx.RLock()
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
n := len(p.m)
if n == 0 {
return nil
}
names := make([]string, 0, n-1)
for name := range p.m {
if name != allPostingsKey.Name {
names = append(names, name)
}
}
return names
}
// LabelValues returns label values for the given name.
func (p *MemPostings) LabelValues(_ context.Context, name string) []string {
p.mtx.RLock()
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
values := make([]string, 0, len(p.m[name]))
for v := range p.m[name] {
values = append(values, v)
}
return values
}
// PostingsStats contains cardinality based statistics for postings.
type PostingsStats struct {
CardinalityMetricsStats []Stat
CardinalityLabelStats []Stat
LabelValueStats []Stat
LabelValuePairsStats []Stat
NumLabelPairs int
}
// Stats calculates the cardinality statistics from postings.
func (p *MemPostings) Stats(label string, limit int) *PostingsStats {
var size uint64
p.mtx.RLock()
metrics := &maxHeap{}
labels := &maxHeap{}
labelValueLength := &maxHeap{}
labelValuePairs := &maxHeap{}
numLabelPairs := 0
metrics.init(limit)
labels.init(limit)
labelValueLength.init(limit)
labelValuePairs.init(limit)
for n, e := range p.m {
if n == "" {
continue
}
labels.push(Stat{Name: n, Count: uint64(len(e))})
numLabelPairs += len(e)
size = 0
for name, values := range e {
if n == label {
metrics.push(Stat{Name: name, Count: uint64(len(values))})
}
seriesCnt := uint64(len(values))
labelValuePairs.push(Stat{Name: n + "=" + name, Count: seriesCnt})
size += uint64(len(name)) * seriesCnt
}
labelValueLength.push(Stat{Name: n, Count: size})
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
return &PostingsStats{
CardinalityMetricsStats: metrics.get(),
CardinalityLabelStats: labels.get(),
LabelValueStats: labelValueLength.get(),
LabelValuePairsStats: labelValuePairs.get(),
NumLabelPairs: numLabelPairs,
}
}
// Get returns a postings list for the given label pair.
func (p *MemPostings) Get(name, value string) Postings {
var lp []storage.SeriesRef
p.mtx.RLock()
l := p.m[name]
if l != nil {
lp = l[value]
}
p.mtx.RUnlock()
if lp == nil {
return EmptyPostings()
}
return newListPostings(lp...)
}
// All returns a postings list over all documents ever added.
func (p *MemPostings) All() Postings {
return p.Get(AllPostingsKey())
}
// EnsureOrder ensures that all postings lists are sorted. After it returns all further
// calls to add and addFor will insert new IDs in a sorted manner.
// Parameter numberOfConcurrentProcesses is used to specify the maximal number of
// CPU cores used for this operation. If it is <= 0, GOMAXPROCS is used.
// GOMAXPROCS was the default before introducing this parameter.
func (p *MemPostings) EnsureOrder(numberOfConcurrentProcesses int) {
p.mtx.Lock()
defer p.mtx.Unlock()
if p.ordered {
return
}
concurrency := numberOfConcurrentProcesses
if concurrency <= 0 {
concurrency = runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0)
}
workc := make(chan *[][]storage.SeriesRef)
var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(concurrency)
for i := 0; i < concurrency; i++ {
go func() {
for job := range workc {
for _, l := range *job {
slices.Sort(l)
}
*job = (*job)[:0]
ensureOrderBatchPool.Put(job)
}
wg.Done()
}()
}
nextJob := ensureOrderBatchPool.Get().(*[][]storage.SeriesRef)
for _, e := range p.m {
for _, l := range e {
*nextJob = append(*nextJob, l)
if len(*nextJob) >= ensureOrderBatchSize {
workc <- nextJob
nextJob = ensureOrderBatchPool.Get().(*[][]storage.SeriesRef)
}
}
}
// If the last job was partially filled, we need to push it to workers too.
if len(*nextJob) > 0 {
workc <- nextJob
}
close(workc)
wg.Wait()
p.ordered = true
}
// Delete removes all ids in the given map from the postings lists.
// affectedLabels contains all the labels that are affected by the deletion, there's no need to check other labels.
func (p *MemPostings) Delete(deleted map[storage.SeriesRef]struct{}, affected map[labels.Label]struct{}) {
p.mtx.Lock()
defer p.mtx.Unlock()
process := func(l labels.Label) {
orig := p.m[l.Name][l.Value]
repl := make([]storage.SeriesRef, 0, len(orig))
for _, id := range orig {
if _, ok := deleted[id]; !ok {
repl = append(repl, id)
}
}
if len(repl) > 0 {
p.m[l.Name][l.Value] = repl
} else {
delete(p.m[l.Name], l.Value)
// Delete the key if we removed all values.
if len(p.m[l.Name]) == 0 {
delete(p.m, l.Name)
}
}
}
for l := range affected {
process(l)
}
process(allPostingsKey)
}
// Iter calls f for each postings list. It aborts if f returns an error and returns it.
func (p *MemPostings) Iter(f func(labels.Label, Postings) error) error {
p.mtx.RLock()
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
for n, e := range p.m {
for v, p := range e {
if err := f(labels.Label{Name: n, Value: v}, newListPostings(p...)); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}
return nil
}
// Add a label set to the postings index.
func (p *MemPostings) Add(id storage.SeriesRef, lset labels.Labels) {
p.mtx.Lock()
lset.Range(func(l labels.Label) {
p.addFor(id, l)
})
p.addFor(id, allPostingsKey)
p.mtx.Unlock()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func (p *MemPostings) addFor(id storage.SeriesRef, l labels.Label) {
nm, ok := p.m[l.Name]
if !ok {
nm = map[string][]storage.SeriesRef{}
p.m[l.Name] = nm
}
list := append(nm[l.Value], id)
nm[l.Value] = list
if !p.ordered {
return
}
// There is no guarantee that no higher ID was inserted before as they may
// be generated independently before adding them to postings.
// We repair order violations on insert. The invariant is that the first n-1
// items in the list are already sorted.
for i := len(list) - 1; i >= 1; i-- {
if list[i] >= list[i-1] {
break
}
list[i], list[i-1] = list[i-1], list[i]
}
}
func (p *MemPostings) PostingsForLabelMatching(ctx context.Context, name string, match func(string) bool) Postings {
// We'll copy the values into a slice and then match over that,
// this way we don't need to hold the mutex while we're matching,
// which can be slow (seconds) if the match function is a huge regex.
// Holding this lock prevents new series from being added (slows down the write path)
// and blocks the compaction process.
vals := p.labelValues(name)
for i, count := 0, 1; i < len(vals); count++ {
if count%checkContextEveryNIterations == 0 && ctx.Err() != nil {
return ErrPostings(ctx.Err())
}
if match(vals[i]) {
i++
continue
}
// Didn't match, bring the last value to this position, make the slice shorter and check again.
// The order of the slice doesn't matter as it comes from a map iteration.
vals[i], vals = vals[len(vals)-1], vals[:len(vals)-1]
}
// If none matched (or this label had no values), no need to grab the lock again.
if len(vals) == 0 {
return EmptyPostings()
}
// Now `vals` only contains the values that matched, get their postings.
its := make([]Postings, 0, len(vals))
p.mtx.RLock()
e := p.m[name]
for _, v := range vals {
if refs, ok := e[v]; ok {
// Some of the values may have been garbage-collected in the meantime this is fine, we'll just skip them.
// If we didn't let the mutex go, we'd have these postings here, but they would be pointing nowhere
// because there would be a `MemPostings.Delete()` call waiting for the lock to delete these labels,
// because the series were deleted already.
its = append(its, NewListPostings(refs))
}
}
// Let the mutex go before merging.
p.mtx.RUnlock()
return Merge(ctx, its...)
}
// labelValues returns a slice of label values for the given label name.
// It will take the read lock.
func (p *MemPostings) labelValues(name string) []string {
p.mtx.RLock()
defer p.mtx.RUnlock()
e := p.m[name]
if len(e) == 0 {
return nil
}
vals := make([]string, 0, len(e))
for v, srs := range e {
if len(srs) > 0 {
vals = append(vals, v)
}
}
return vals
}
// ExpandPostings returns the postings expanded as a slice.
func ExpandPostings(p Postings) (res []storage.SeriesRef, err error) {
for p.Next() {
res = append(res, p.At())
}
return res, p.Err()
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
// Postings provides iterative access over a postings list.
type Postings interface {
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
// Next advances the iterator and returns true if another value was found.
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
Next() bool
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
// Seek advances the iterator to value v or greater and returns
// true if a value was found.
Seek(v storage.SeriesRef) bool
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
2017-01-02 04:27:52 -08:00
// At returns the value at the current iterator position.
// At should only be called after a successful call to Next or Seek.
At() storage.SeriesRef
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
// Err returns the last error of the iterator.
Err() error
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
// errPostings is an empty iterator that always errors.
type errPostings struct {
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
err error
}
func (e errPostings) Next() bool { return false }
func (e errPostings) Seek(storage.SeriesRef) bool { return false }
func (e errPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef { return 0 }
func (e errPostings) Err() error { return e.err }
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
var emptyPostings = errPostings{}
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
// EmptyPostings returns a postings list that's always empty.
// NOTE: Returning EmptyPostings sentinel when Postings struct has no postings is recommended.
// It triggers optimized flow in other functions like Intersect, Without etc.
func EmptyPostings() Postings {
return emptyPostings
}
// IsEmptyPostingsType returns true if the postings are an empty postings list.
// When this function returns false, it doesn't mean that the postings isn't empty
// (it could be an empty intersection of two non-empty postings, for example).
func IsEmptyPostingsType(p Postings) bool {
return p == emptyPostings
}
// ErrPostings returns new postings that immediately error.
func ErrPostings(err error) Postings {
return errPostings{err}
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
// Intersect returns a new postings list over the intersection of the
// input postings.
func Intersect(its ...Postings) Postings {
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
if len(its) == 0 {
return EmptyPostings()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2017-06-12 23:25:13 -07:00
if len(its) == 1 {
return its[0]
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
for _, p := range its {
if p == EmptyPostings() {
return EmptyPostings()
}
}
return newIntersectPostings(its...)
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
type intersectPostings struct {
arr []Postings
cur storage.SeriesRef
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
}
func newIntersectPostings(its ...Postings) *intersectPostings {
return &intersectPostings{arr: its}
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func (it *intersectPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
return it.cur
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func (it *intersectPostings) doNext() bool {
Loop:
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
for {
for _, p := range it.arr {
if !p.Seek(it.cur) {
return false
}
if p.At() > it.cur {
it.cur = p.At()
continue Loop
}
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
}
return true
}
}
func (it *intersectPostings) Next() bool {
for _, p := range it.arr {
if !p.Next() {
return false
}
if p.At() > it.cur {
it.cur = p.At()
}
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
}
return it.doNext()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func (it *intersectPostings) Seek(id storage.SeriesRef) bool {
it.cur = id
return it.doNext()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2016-12-14 12:58:29 -08:00
func (it *intersectPostings) Err() error {
for _, p := range it.arr {
if p.Err() != nil {
return p.Err()
}
2016-12-27 02:32:10 -08:00
}
return nil
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
}
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
// Merge returns a new iterator over the union of the input iterators.
func Merge(_ context.Context, its ...Postings) Postings {
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
if len(its) == 0 {
return EmptyPostings()
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
2017-06-12 23:25:13 -07:00
if len(its) == 1 {
return its[0]
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
p, ok := newMergedPostings(its)
if !ok {
return EmptyPostings()
}
return p
}
type mergedPostings struct {
p []Postings
h *loser.Tree[storage.SeriesRef, Postings]
cur storage.SeriesRef
}
func newMergedPostings(p []Postings) (m *mergedPostings, nonEmpty bool) {
const maxVal = storage.SeriesRef(math.MaxUint64) // This value must be higher than all real values used in the tree.
lt := loser.New(p, maxVal)
return &mergedPostings{p: p, h: lt}, true
}
func (it *mergedPostings) Next() bool {
for {
if !it.h.Next() {
return false
}
// Remove duplicate entries.
newItem := it.h.At()
if newItem != it.cur {
it.cur = newItem
return true
}
}
}
func (it *mergedPostings) Seek(id storage.SeriesRef) bool {
for !it.h.IsEmpty() && it.h.At() < id {
finished := !it.h.Winner().Seek(id)
it.h.Fix(finished)
}
if it.h.IsEmpty() {
return false
}
it.cur = it.h.At()
return true
}
func (it mergedPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
return it.cur
}
func (it mergedPostings) Err() error {
for _, p := range it.p {
if err := p.Err(); err != nil {
return err
}
}
return nil
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
}
// Without returns a new postings list that contains all elements from the full list that
// are not in the drop list.
func Without(full, drop Postings) Postings {
if full == EmptyPostings() {
return EmptyPostings()
}
if drop == EmptyPostings() {
return full
}
return newRemovedPostings(full, drop)
}
type removedPostings struct {
full, remove Postings
cur storage.SeriesRef
initialized bool
fok, rok bool
}
func newRemovedPostings(full, remove Postings) *removedPostings {
return &removedPostings{
full: full,
remove: remove,
}
}
func (rp *removedPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
return rp.cur
}
func (rp *removedPostings) Next() bool {
if !rp.initialized {
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
rp.rok = rp.remove.Next()
rp.initialized = true
}
for {
if !rp.fok {
return false
}
if !rp.rok {
rp.cur = rp.full.At()
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
return true
}
switch fcur, rcur := rp.full.At(), rp.remove.At(); {
case fcur < rcur:
rp.cur = fcur
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
return true
case rcur < fcur:
// Forward the remove postings to the right position.
rp.rok = rp.remove.Seek(fcur)
default:
// Skip the current posting.
rp.fok = rp.full.Next()
}
}
}
func (rp *removedPostings) Seek(id storage.SeriesRef) bool {
if rp.cur >= id {
return true
}
rp.fok = rp.full.Seek(id)
rp.rok = rp.remove.Seek(id)
rp.initialized = true
return rp.Next()
}
func (rp *removedPostings) Err() error {
if rp.full.Err() != nil {
return rp.full.Err()
}
return rp.remove.Err()
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
// ListPostings implements the Postings interface over a plain list.
type ListPostings struct {
list []storage.SeriesRef
cur storage.SeriesRef
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func NewListPostings(list []storage.SeriesRef) Postings {
return newListPostings(list...)
}
func newListPostings(list ...storage.SeriesRef) *ListPostings {
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
return &ListPostings{list: list}
}
func (it *ListPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
return it.cur
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
func (it *ListPostings) Next() bool {
if len(it.list) > 0 {
it.cur = it.list[0]
it.list = it.list[1:]
return true
}
it.cur = 0
return false
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
func (it *ListPostings) Seek(x storage.SeriesRef) bool {
// If the current value satisfies, then return.
if it.cur >= x {
return true
}
if len(it.list) == 0 {
return false
}
// Do binary search between current position and end.
i := sort.Search(len(it.list), func(i int) bool {
return it.list[i] >= x
})
if i < len(it.list) {
it.cur = it.list[i]
it.list = it.list[i+1:]
return true
}
it.list = nil
return false
2016-12-04 04:16:11 -08:00
}
Be smarter in how we look at matchers. (#572) * Add unittests for PostingsForMatcher. * Selector methods are all stateless, don't need a reference. * Be smarter in how we look at matchers. Look at all matchers to see if a label can be empty. Optimise Not handling, so i!="2" is a simple lookup rather than an inverse postings list. All all the Withouts together, rather than having to subtract each from all postings. Change the pre-expand the postings logic to always do it before doing a Without only. Don't do that if it's already a list. The initial goal here was that the oft-seen pattern i=~"something.+",i!="foo",i!="bar" becomes more efficient. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1"-4 5888 6160 +4.62% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j="foo"-4 7190 6640 -7.65% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/j="foo",n="1"-4 6038 5923 -1.90% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",j!="foo"-4 6030884 4850525 -19.57% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".*"-4 887377940 230329137 -74.04% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~".+"-4 490316101 319931758 -34.75% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i=~""-4 594961991 130279313 -78.10% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/i!=""-4 537542388 318751015 -40.70% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4 10460243 8565195 -18.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4 44964267 8561546 -80.96% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4 42244885 29137737 -31.03% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4 35285834 32774584 -7.12% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4 8951047 8379024 -6.39% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4 63813335 30672688 -51.93% BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4 45381112 44924397 -1.01% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-04-09 03:59:45 -07:00
func (it *ListPostings) Err() error {
2016-12-13 06:26:58 -08:00
return nil
}
// bigEndianPostings implements the Postings interface over a byte stream of
// big endian numbers.
type bigEndianPostings struct {
list []byte
cur uint32
}
func newBigEndianPostings(list []byte) *bigEndianPostings {
return &bigEndianPostings{list: list}
}
func (it *bigEndianPostings) At() storage.SeriesRef {
return storage.SeriesRef(it.cur)
}
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Next() bool {
if len(it.list) >= 4 {
it.cur = binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list)
it.list = it.list[4:]
return true
}
return false
}
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Seek(x storage.SeriesRef) bool {
if storage.SeriesRef(it.cur) >= x {
return true
}
num := len(it.list) / 4
// Do binary search between current position and end.
i := sort.Search(num, func(i int) bool {
2017-09-04 07:08:38 -07:00
return binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list[i*4:]) >= uint32(x)
})
if i < num {
j := i * 4
it.cur = binary.BigEndian.Uint32(it.list[j:])
it.list = it.list[j+4:]
return true
}
it.list = nil
return false
}
func (it *bigEndianPostings) Err() error {
return nil
}
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
// FindIntersectingPostings checks the intersection of p and candidates[i] for each i in candidates,
// if intersection is non empty, then i is added to the indexes returned.
// Returned indexes are not sorted.
func FindIntersectingPostings(p Postings, candidates []Postings) (indexes []int, err error) {
h := make(postingsWithIndexHeap, 0, len(candidates))
for idx, it := range candidates {
switch {
case it.Next():
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
h = append(h, postingsWithIndex{index: idx, p: it})
case it.Err() != nil:
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
return nil, it.Err()
}
}
if h.empty() {
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
return nil, nil
}
heap.Init(&h)
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
for !h.empty() {
if !p.Seek(h.at()) {
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
return indexes, p.Err()
}
if p.At() == h.at() {
indexes = append(indexes, h.popIndex())
} else if err := h.next(); err != nil {
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
return nil, err
}
}
return indexes, nil
}
// postingsWithIndex is used as postingsWithIndexHeap elements by FindIntersectingPostings,
// keeping track of the original index of each postings while they move inside the heap.
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
type postingsWithIndex struct {
index int
p Postings
// popped means that these postings shouldn't be considered anymore.
// See popIndex() comment to understand why we need this.
popped bool
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
}
// postingsWithIndexHeap implements heap.Interface,
// with root always pointing to the postings with minimum Postings.At() value.
// It also implements a special way of removing elements that marks them as popped and moves them to the bottom of the
// heap instead of actually removing them, see popIndex() for more details.
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
type postingsWithIndexHeap []postingsWithIndex
// empty checks whether the heap is empty, which is true if it has no elements, of if the smallest element is popped.
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) empty() bool {
return len(*h) == 0 || (*h)[0].popped
}
// popIndex pops the smallest heap element and returns its index.
// In our implementation we don't actually do heap.Pop(), instead we mark the element as `popped` and fix its position, which
// should be after all the non-popped elements according to our sorting strategy.
// By skipping the `heap.Pop()` call we avoid an extra allocation in this heap's Pop() implementation which returns an interface{}.
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) popIndex() int {
index := (*h)[0].index
(*h)[0].popped = true
heap.Fix(h, 0)
return index
}
// at provides the storage.SeriesRef where root Postings is pointing at this moment.
func (h postingsWithIndexHeap) at() storage.SeriesRef { return h[0].p.At() }
// next performs the Postings.Next() operation on the root of the heap, performing the related operation on the heap
// and conveniently returning the result of calling Postings.Err() if the result of calling Next() was false.
// If Next() succeeds, heap is fixed to move the root to its new position, according to its Postings.At() value.
// If Next() returns fails and there's no error reported by Postings.Err(), then root is marked as removed and heap is fixed.
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) next() error {
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
pi := (*h)[0]
next := pi.p.Next()
if next {
heap.Fix(h, 0)
return nil
}
if err := pi.p.Err(); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("postings %d: %w", pi.index, err)
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
}
h.popIndex()
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
return nil
}
// Len implements heap.Interface.
// Notice that Len() > 0 does not imply that heap is not empty as elements are not removed from this heap.
// Use empty() to check whether heap is empty or not.
func (h postingsWithIndexHeap) Len() int { return len(h) }
// Less implements heap.Interface, it puts all the popped elements at the bottom,
// and then sorts by Postings.At() property of each node.
func (h postingsWithIndexHeap) Less(i, j int) bool {
if h[i].popped != h[j].popped {
return h[j].popped
}
return h[i].p.At() < h[j].p.At()
}
// Swap implements heap.Interface.
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) Swap(i, j int) { (*h)[i], (*h)[j] = (*h)[j], (*h)[i] }
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
// Push implements heap.Interface.
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) Push(x interface{}) {
*h = append(*h, x.(postingsWithIndex))
}
// Pop implements heap.Interface and pops the last element, which is NOT the min element,
// so this doesn't return the same heap.Pop()
// Although this method is implemented for correctness, we don't expect it to be used, see popIndex() method for details.
Label values with matchers by intersecting postings (#9907) * LabelValues w/matchers by intersecting postings Instead of iterating all matched series to find the values, this checks if each one of the label values is present in the matched series (postings). Pending to be benchmarked. Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Benchmark labelValuesWithMatchers name old time/op new time/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% name old alloc/op new alloc/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% name old allocs/op new allocs/op Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Don't expand postings to intersect them Using a min heap we can check whether matched postings intersect with each one of the label values postings. This avoid expanding postings (and thus having all of them in memory at any point). Slightly slower than the expanding postings version for some cases, but definitely pays the price once the cardinality grows. Still offers 10x latency improvement where previous latencies were reaching 1s. Benchmark results: name \ time/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 157ms ± 0% 48ms ± 0% 110ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.80s ± 0% 0.46s ± 0% 0.18s ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 144ms ± 0% 57ms ± 0% 125ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304ms ± 0% 111ms ± 0% 177ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 761ms ± 0% 164ms ± 0% 134ms ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.11µs ± 0% 6.62µs ± 0% 4.29µs ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 117ms ± 0% 62ms ± 0% 120ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 1.44s ± 0% 0.24s ± 0% 0.15s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 92.1ms ± 0% 70.3ms ± 0% 125.4ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 196ms ± 0% 115ms ± 0% 170ms ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 1.23s ± 0% 0.21s ± 0% 0.14s ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 1.06ms ± 0% 0.88ms ± 0% 0.92ms ± 0% name \ alloc/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 29.5MB ± 0% 26.9MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 46.8MB ± 0% 251.5MB ± 0% 36.3MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 29.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% 19.1MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 46.8MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 10.3kB ± 0% 138535.2kB ± 0% 6.4kB ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 5.54kB ± 0% 7.09kB ± 0% 4.30kB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 39.1MB ± 0% 28.5MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 287MB ± 0% 253MB ± 0% 38MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 34.3MB ± 0% 23.9MB ± 0% 20.7MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 51.6MB ± 0% 25.5MB ± 0% 22.3MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 144MB ± 0% 139MB ± 0% 0MB ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 6.43kB ± 0% 8.66kB ± 0% 5.86kB ± 0% name \ allocs/op old.txt intersect.txt intersect_noexpand.txt Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 104k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 500k ± 0% 300k ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 66.0 ± 0% 255.0 ± 0% 139.0 ± 0% Querier/Head/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 205.0 ± 0% 87.0 ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="^.+$" 5.20M ± 0% 0.70M ± 0% 0.50M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",j!="foo" 204k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/i_with_n="1",i=~"^.*$",j!="foo" 304k ± 0% 600k ± 0% 400k ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_j!="foo" 3.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% Querier/Block/labelValuesWithMatchers/n_with_i="1" 61.0 ± 0% 247.0 ± 0% 129.0 ± 0% Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Apply comment suggestions from the code review Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com> * Change else { if } to else if Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> * Remove sorting of label values We were not sorting them before, so no need to sort them now Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com> Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-12-28 06:59:03 -08:00
func (h *postingsWithIndexHeap) Pop() interface{} {
old := *h
n := len(old)
x := old[n-1]
*h = old[0 : n-1]
return x
}