Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
We haven't updated golint-ci in our CI yet, but this commit prepares
for that.
There are a lot of new warnings, and it is mostly because the "revive"
linter got updated. I agree with most of the new warnings, mostly
around not naming unused function parameters (although it is justified
in some cases for documentation purposes – while things like mocks are
a good example where not naming the parameter is clearer).
I'm pretty upset about the "empty block" warning to include `for`
loops. It's such a common pattern to do something in the head of the
`for` loop and then have an empty block. There is still an open issue
about this: https://github.com/mgechev/revive/issues/810 I have
disabled "revive" altogether in files where empty blocks are used
excessively, and I have made the effort to add individual
`// nolint:revive` where empty blocks are used just once or twice.
It's borderline noisy, though, but let's go with it for now.
I should mention that none of the "empty block" warnings for `for`
loop bodies were legitimate.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
In the past, every sample value was a float, so it was fine to call a
variable holding such a float "value" or "sample". With native
histograms, a sample might have a histogram value. And a histogram
value is still a value. Calling a float value just "value" or "sample"
or "V" is therefore misleading. Over the last few commits, I already
renamed many variables, but this cleans up a few more places where the
changes are more invasive.
Note that we do not to attempt naming in the JSON APIs or in the
protobufs. That would be quite a disruption. However, internally, we
can call variables as we want, and we should go with the option of
avoiding misunderstandings.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can
either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for
floats and an `HPoint` for histograms.
This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout
the codebase.
The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that
happened after native histograms had been added.
The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still
“polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each
step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated.
The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back
to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch
histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test
data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change
in the benchmark result at all.
First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit:
```
name old time/op new time/op delta
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
```
And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit:
```
name old time/op new time/op delta
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9)
```
In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for
queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this
commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good
because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest
absolute runtime).
In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at
all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations
happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has
to be addressed in a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
It took a `Labels` where the memory could be re-used, but in practice
this hardly ever benefitted. Especially after converting `relabel.Process`
to `relabel.ProcessBuilder`.
Comparing the parameter to `nil` was a bug; `EmptyLabels` is not `nil`
so the slice was reallocated multiple times by `append`.
Lastly `Builder.Labels()` now estimates that the final size will depend
on labels added and deleted.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
We use `labels.Builder` to parse metrics, to avoid depending on the
internal implementation. This is not efficient, but the feature is only
used in tests. It wasn't efficient previously either - calling `Sort()`
after adding each label.
`createLabelsForAbsentFunction` also uses a Builder now, and gets
an extra `map` to replace the previous `Has()` usage.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Fix up promql to compile with changes to Labels
* Switch from 'sanity' to more inclusive lanuage
"Removing ableist language in code is important; it helps to create and
maintain an environment that welcomes all developers of all backgrounds,
while emphasizing that we as developers select the most articulate,
precise, descriptive language we can rather than relying on metaphors.
The phrase sanity check is ableist, and unnecessarily references mental
health in our code bases. It denotes that people with mental illnesses
are inferior, wrong, or incorrect, and the phrase sanity continues to be
used by employers and other individuals to discriminate against these
people."
From https://gist.github.com/seanmhanson/fe370c2d8bd2b3228680e38899baf5cc
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
And use the new method to call to compact Histograms during
parsing. This happens for both `Histogram` and `FloatHistogram`. In
this way, if targets decide to optimize the exposition size by merging
spans with empty buckets in between, we still get a normalized
results. It will also normalize away any valid but weird
representations like empty spans, spans with offset zero, and empty
buckets at the start or end of a span.
The implementation seemed easy at first as it just turns the
`compactBuckets` helper into a generic function (which now got its own
file). However, the integer Histograms have delta buckets instead of
absolute buckets, which had to be treated specially in the generic
`compactBuckets` function. To make sure it works, I have added plenty
of explicit tests for `Histogram` in addition to the `FloatHistogram`
tests.
I have also updated the doc comment for the `Compact` method.
Based on the insights now expressed in the doc comment, compacting
with a maxEmptyBuckets > 0 is rarely useful. Therefore, this commit
also sets the value to 0 in the two cases we were using 3 so far. We
might still want to reconsider, so I don't want to remove the
maxEmptyBuckets parameter right now.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
* Update go to 1.19, set min version to 1.18
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@o11y.eu>
* Update golangci-lint
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@o11y.eu>
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@o11y.eu>
* model/relabel: Add benchmark
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: re-use Builder across relabels
Saves memory allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* labels.Builder: allow re-use of result slice
This reduces memory allocations where the caller has a suitable slice available.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* model/relabel: re-use source values slice
To reduce memory allocations.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Unwind one change causing test failures
Restore original behaviour in PopulateLabels, where we must not overwrite the input set.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* relabel: simplify values optimisation
Use a stack-based array for up to 16 source labels, which will be the
vast majority of cases.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* lint
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
This follow a simple function-based approach to access the count and
sum fields of a native Histogram. It might be more elegant to
implement “accessors” via the dot operator, as considered in the
brainstorming doc [1]. However, that would require the introduction of
a whole new concept in PromQL. For the PoC, we should be fine with the
function-based approch. Even the obvious inefficiencies (rate'ing a
whole histogram twice when we only want to rate each the count and the
sum once) could be optimized behind the scenes.
Note that the function-based approach elegantly solves the problem of
detecting counter resets in the sum of observations in the case of
negative observations. (Since the whole native Histogram is rate'd,
the counter reset is detected for the Histogram as a whole.)
We will decide later if an “accessor” approach is really needed. It
would change the example expression for average duration in
functions.md from
histogram_sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds[10m]))
/
histogram_count(rate(http_request_duration_seconds[10m]))
to
rate(http_request_duration_seconds.sum[10m])
/
rate(http_request_duration_seconds.count[10m])
[1]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ch6ru8GKg03N02jRjYriurt-CZqUVY09evPg6yKTA1s/edit
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
* Labels: create signature with/without labels
Instead of creating a new Labels slice then converting to signature,
go directly to the signature and save time.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Labels: refactor Builder tests
Have one test with a range of cases, and have them check the final
output rather than checking the internal structure of the Builder.
Also add a couple of cases where the value is "", which should be
interpreted as 'delete'.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Labels: add 'Keep' function to Builder
This lets us replace `Labels.WithLabels` with the more general `Builder`.
In `engine.resultMetric()` we can call `Keep()` instead of checking
and calling `Del()`.
Avoid calling `Sort()` in `Builder.Labels()` if we didn't add anything,
so that `Keep()` has the same performance as `WithLabels()`.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
For conventional histograms, we need to gather all the individual
bucket timeseries at a data point to do the quantile calculation. The
code so far mirrored this behavior for the new native
histograms. However, since a single data point contains all the
buckets alreade, that's actually not needed. This PR simplifies the
code while still detecting a mix of conventional and native
histograms.
The weird signature calculation for the conventional histograms is
getting even weirder because of that. If this PR turns out to do the
right thing, I will implement a proper fix for the signature
calculation upstream.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
* MergeFloatBucketIterator for []FloatBucketIterator
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* histogram_quantile for histograms
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Fix histogram_quantile
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Unit test and enhancements
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Iterators to iterate buckets in reverse and all buckets together including zero bucket
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Consider all buckets for histogram_quantile and fix the implementation
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Remove unneeded code
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Fix lint
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Add test case to showcase the problem in #9590
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jackson <jacksontj.89@gmail.com>
* Don't unwrap ParenExpr in newStepInvariantExpr
Fixes#9590
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jackson <jacksontj.89@gmail.com>
This creates a new `model` directory and moves all data-model related
packages over there:
exemplar labels relabel rulefmt textparse timestamp value
All the others are more or less utilities and have been moved to `util`:
gate logging modetimevfs pool runtime
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
This commit adds `@ <timestamp>` modifier as per this design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uSbD3T2beM-iX4-Hp7V074bzBRiRNlqUdcWP6JTDQSs/edit.
An example query:
```
rate(process_cpu_seconds_total[1m])
and
topk(7, rate(process_cpu_seconds_total[1h] @ 1234))
```
which ranks based on last 1h rate and w.r.t. unix timestamp 1234 but actually plots the 1m rate.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
* Use go1.14 new hash/maphash to hash both RHS and LHS instead of XOR'ing
which has been resulting in hash collisions.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Refactor engine labelset signature generation, just use labels.Labels
instead of hashes.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address review comments; function comments + store result of
lhs.String+rhs.String as key.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Replace all signatureFunc usage with signatureFuncString.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Make optimizations to labels String function and generation of rhs+lhs
as string in resultMetric.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Use separate string functions that don't use strconv just for engine
maps.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Use a byte invalid separator instead of quoting and have a buffer
attached to EvalNodeHelper instead of using a global pool in the labels
package.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address review comments.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Address more review comments, labels has a function that now builds a
byte slice without turning it into a string.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Use two different non-ascii hex codes as byte separators between labels
and between sets of labels when building bytes of a Labels struct.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* We only need the 2nd byte invalid sep. at the beginning of a
labels.Bytes
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
* Move check for empty VectorSelector to typeChecking
* Move check for twice set metric name to typeChecking
* Make child of MatrixSelector a general Node
* rename checkType to checkAST
* Rename fail to addParseErr
* Remove trailing whitespace
Signed-off-by: Tobias Guggenmos <tguggenm@redhat.com>
* Cleanup PromQL functions
The engine ensures, for Matrix functions, that functions are called with exactly one series at the time.
Therefore a lot of code can be inlined and we can directly assume the first element of the arguments exists and contains all the samples needed.
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@inuits.eu>
This PR exports the list of supported PromQL functions and their signatures.
The reason for that is that the PromQL language server likes to use that list.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Guggenmos <tguggenm@redhat.com>
i) Uses the more idiomatic Wrap and Wrapf methods for creating nested errors.
ii) Fixes some incorrect usages of fmt.Errorf where the error messages don't have any formatting directives.
iii) Does away with the use of fmt package for errors in favour of pkg/errors
Signed-off-by: tariqibrahim <tariq181290@gmail.com>
* use Welford/Knuth method to compute standard deviation and variance, avoids float precision issues
* use better method for calculating avg and avg_over_time
Signed-off-by: Dan Cech <dcech@grafana.com>
* Move range logic to 'eval'
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make aggregegate range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Start making function evaluation ranged
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make instant queries a special case of range queries
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Eliminate evalString
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make unary operators range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make binops range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Pass time to range-aware functions.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make simple _over_time functions range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Add basic benchmark for range evaluation
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Reuse objects for function arguments
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25%
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make rate&friends range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make date functions range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make simple math functions range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Convert more functions to be range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make more functions range aware
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Remove transition code for functions
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Remove the rest of the engine transition code
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Remove more obselete code
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Remove the last uses of the eval* functions
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption
The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called
just before the value they were retruning to the pool
was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query
could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Add new benchmark suite for range functinos
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Migrate existing benchmarks to new system
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Expand promql benchmarks
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Simply test by removing unused range code
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* When testing instant queries, check range queries too.
To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being
affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates
an instant query that we know works again as a range query
with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Unary minus should remove metric name
Cut down benchmarks for faster runs.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60%
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Use evalNodeHelper with functions
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation.
This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName
across steps.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Simplify benchmark code.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Add caching in VectorBinop
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Add more benchmarks
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Call Query.Close in apiv1
This allows point slices allocated for the response data
to be reused by later queries, saving allocations.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Optimise histogram_quantile
It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Address Fabian's comments
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Comments from Alin.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Address jrv's comments
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Remove dead code
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Address Simon's comments.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Handle case where function has non-matrix args first
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Cleanup and make things more consistent
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Make EvalNodeHelper public
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
* Fabian's comments.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
With the squaring of the timestamp, we run into the
limitations of the 53bit mantissa for a 64bit float.
By subtracting away a timestamp of one of the samples (which is how the
intercept is used) we avoid this issue in practice as it's unlikely
that it is used over a very long time range.
Fixes#2674
Make the timestamp of instant vectors be the timestamp of the sample
rather than the evaluation. We were not using this anywhere, so this is
safe.
Add a function to return the timestamp of samples in an instant vector.
Fixes#1557
